General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

£38,000 per year

Page 0 + 1 of 2

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Running Bear

Running Bear Report 30 Jun 2010 12:03

what for?

Rambling

Rambling Report 30 Jun 2010 12:10

erm don't know...but I'll do it lol

Running Bear

Running Bear Report 1 Jul 2010 10:30

this is the average cost for one person in prison a year, got to be a better way.

StrayKitten

StrayKitten Report 1 Jul 2010 10:39

ya joking rnt ya, they get more than us normal people lol x

Silly Sausage

Silly Sausage Report 1 Jul 2010 10:51

and they say crime doesnt pay tsk

Running Bear

Running Bear Report 1 Jul 2010 10:54

this is the cost to us the tax payer

ChAoTicintheNewYear

ChAoTicintheNewYear Report 1 Jul 2010 11:21

What are the breakdown costs???

StrayKitten

StrayKitten Report 1 Jul 2010 11:22

to many tellys n play stations haha x

Rambling

Rambling Report 1 Jul 2010 11:31

" It now costs more to put someone in prison – £38,000 – than it does to send a boy to Eton."

Now what about.... all the young petty offenders being re-directed from prisons to public schools on first offence ...where they can have the opportunity to find some skills, some self respect and respect for others...... ??

Liz 47

Liz 47 Report 1 Jul 2010 12:29

I think they should be made to do some useful work - when I was a child there were working parties of prisoners on Dartmoor - let them earn their keep
Liz

StrayKitten

StrayKitten Report 1 Jul 2010 13:06

thats a very good idea bev lol x

Rambling

Rambling Report 1 Jul 2010 13:11

For what purpose Beverley? clearing IEDs perhaps? would that just apply to 'serious' crimes...or just everyone in prison? send all the serial killers out there or just the kids who need a 'short sharp shock' ?........

Izzy

Izzy Report 1 Jul 2010 13:11

what about reintroducing national service, that way we would save on prisons and maybe with the savings my son and his fellow soldiers would be able to get a decent wage for risking their lives on an hourly basis, with the most basic of provisions, next to no contact with their families......... think i better stop here before i get myself into trouble!! x
Rose, my son gets approx £16,000 per year for clearing IED's and he's never committed any crimes!!!

Conan

Conan Report 1 Jul 2010 13:29

No good sending them to Afghanistan to fight ................... they would lose their human rights.

And we can't have that ............ can we ?

Rambling

Rambling Report 1 Jul 2010 13:40

Well you may have a good point about it if they could be properly trained but since as Izzy points out our forces are already underpaid and underequipped..I don't think it's really viable to send out prisoners with no training and no choice.

Running Bear

Running Bear Report 1 Jul 2010 13:48

sending them to Afghanistan, just what most would love, free for all on drugs, fields and fields of the stuff, save all the bother of getting it to uk.

ChAoTicintheNewYear

ChAoTicintheNewYear Report 1 Jul 2010 13:57

If they were sent to Afghanistan what would stop them from going awol at the first opportunity? Would any professional soldier really want to fight beside someone who didn't want to be there, to rely on that person to keep him/her safe.

Running Bear

Running Bear Report 1 Jul 2010 13:59

Bev, the Supreme Court ruled that the Human Rights Act does not apply to soldiers abroad

Rambling

Rambling Report 1 Jul 2010 14:01

I really don't think our troops would want "violent offenders" in their ranks? people they couldn't trust or rely on? putting guns in the hands of violent offenders on the 'inside' would probably prove more dangerous than the enemy they face 'outside'.

Give young offenders a choice perhaps...the 3 month sentence in prison, or 3 months army training...but then wasn't much the same tried already with 'boot camps'? back in the 80s?

Rambling

Rambling Report 1 Jul 2010 14:01

lol I was typing as you posted Cat :)