General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

threat to British society....a little story :)

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

LadyBarbara

LadyBarbara Report 18 Jul 2008 12:46

Good point Rose, but there's lots of reasons that make me feel this way, how some Brits talk to people in other countries when they're on holiday, how we still think we are superior in our religion, our culture, our life style when reality is so much different. I have lived abroad for nine years and used to feel proud to be British but now I'm not so sure.
Saying all that I still feel there are a lot of good things still going on in our country, how for example,
we dig deep to help out when there is a tragedy in the world, or how we always help when there is a disaster, but deep down I feel we are failing somewhere along the line or we would all be going about happy with all that is going on in our country.
I'm not very clever with words I just know what I feel............

MrDaff

MrDaff Report 18 Jul 2008 12:47

lol Thank you, Lesley *blushes*

Kathryn, I totally agree with your comments on the Catholic Church - not the people who are Catholic, you understand, but the Pope and the mass murdering and genocide that he is responsible for.

But that is another topic.

By the way, my son's friends brother was targeted they think, at about 14 or 15 by a *teacher* at the mosque the family attended. The family dealt with it and moved him away, and he has grown into a fine and gentle young man, like his brother.

Love

Daff xxx

Rambling

Rambling Report 18 Jul 2008 12:58

~~~~waves~~~ to Jeanette

lol I know , I mean Hull for goodness sake!

Actually what reminded me of the 'ginger hair' bit...was when I was a mature student, we studied the Holocast and one of the 'youngsters' 21 was surprised to see on film footage that many of the Jews being loaded on trains to Auschwitz...looked exactly like 'ordinary' Germans...ie they were not Hassidic jews in black coat-tails, hats and dreadlocks.
He had always assumed Jews were 'different' and that is why it was so easy to target them.

This young student had ginger hair and came from Yorkshire....it was said to hm how would he feel if ,having been a part of a society, he was suddenly excluded and vilified because he had a 'funny' accent and ginger hair.....? lol

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){

}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ Report 18 Jul 2008 12:59

Oi watch it.....you're stepping close to the mark now! lolololol

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 18 Jul 2008 13:04

Eldrick, you are simply being disingenuous.

"Anyone who follows any of these faiths must accept that they are following ALL of it. It is not open to picking which parts you follow and which parts you dont. It either stands or falls as a whole, surely."

And you don't get to pronounce what that whole is composed of. To be specific, you don't get to pronounce that publicly executing homosexuals reflects a fundamental and non-negotiable part of the "whole" of Islam that all Muslims must agree to, let alone be held responsible for.

You've mentioned the atrocities committed by religious extremists in Ireland and by Muslims.

How do Stalin's mass murders fit in here?

Eldrick

Eldrick Report 18 Jul 2008 13:09

Stalins always crops up. His murders weren't committed in the name of a god or not a god. They were rampant idealism.

Same as I wouldnt call the nazi atrocities committed in the name of God, depsite Adolf Hitler being a catholic and all german soldiers having Got Mit Uns on their belts and the pope refusing to condemn them!

Dawkins puts the Stalin and Hitler arguments to bed better then I can.

Devon Dweller

Devon Dweller Report 18 Jul 2008 13:13

Children who do this kind of thing are just doing it because they see someone who looks different. I doubt they know which religion they belong to.

Susan719813

Susan719813 Report 18 Jul 2008 13:25

Could you elaborate on the following Eldrick?


*Anyone who follows any of these faiths must accept that they are following ALL of it. It is not open to picking which parts you follow and which parts you dont*

Surely it is the individuals/groups within a faith who have interpreted it in a way that suits them and not the Faith itself .....or have I misinterpreted your meaning?

~~~Secret Red ^^ Squirrel~~~  **007 1/2**

~~~Secret Red ^^ Squirrel~~~ **007 1/2** Report 18 Jul 2008 13:36

Ian, Stalin persecuted some people because of their religion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Soviet_Union

Soviet tactics

The Soviet Union was the first state to have as an ideological objective the elimination of religion. Toward that end, the Communist regime confiscated church property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in the schools. Actions toward particular religions, however, were determined by State interests, and most organized religions were never outlawed. Some actions against Orthodox priests and believers along with execution included torture being sent to prison camps, labour camps or mental hospitals.[11][12] Many Orthodox (along with peoples of other faiths) were also subjected to psychological punishment or torture and mind control experimentation in order to force them give up their religious convictions (see Piteşti prison). [13][14] It is estimated the some 20 million Christians (18 million Orthodox, 2 million Roman Catholic) died or where interned in gulags under the Soviet regime 2.7 million martyred under Stalin.[15]
Practicing Orthodox Christians were restricted from prominent careers and membership in communist organizations (the party, the Komsomol). Anti-religious propaganda was openly sponsored and encouraged by the government, which the Church was not given an opportunity to publicly respond to. The government youth organization, the Komsomol, encouraged its members to vandalize Orthodox Churches and harass worshipers. Seminaries were closed down, and the church was restricted from using the press.

Edit: I know this is not part of the Atheist 'doctrine' but is an example of how people can twist things just like they have done in certain religions

MrDaff

MrDaff Report 18 Jul 2008 13:43

Actually, most dictatorships, it seems to me, pursue a course of eliminating all institutions that might threaten to maintain or wrest control from their hands.... and so-called *organised religions* have always born the brunt of this... anything that has looked as though it might impede the authority and control is brutalised and decimated. Those allowed to remain *tow the party line*

Henry 8th and the Dissolution of the Monastries, the Crusades, Good old Ghengis, Hitler, Stalin. Chairman Mao, and even the more recent despots, where they have been unable to take control they have outlawed!!

Love

Daff ..... who is now well exhaustimicated cos I don't *do* debate and my brain is hurting!

xxxxxx

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 18 Jul 2008 14:04

I guess what I was really getting at Eldrick, and I may be at odds with the esteemed Dawkins here, I don't know, is that much as I despise religion, I don't actually attribute the ills of the world to it.

The ills of the world are the work of human beings, whatever justification or motivation they claim for their work. I neither excuse what they do nor condemn it based on their claimed motivation. I judge what they do on its merits.

And I don't hold anyone responsible for what someone else does, unless s/he has expressly urged someone else to do something or quite clearly tacitly condoned the doing of it.

If I can assume that you are opposed to the occupation of Iraq, do you think that it would be appropriate for an Iraqi to condemn you publicly, as an individual, for what your government and military have done? Surely there's an even closer connection there; you vote, you pay taxes, you make it possible for them to do what they do.

Would such condemnation of you, personally, not make you feel just a tad insecure? A little like you had a target on your forehead for anyone who opposed the actions of your government and military in Iraq?

Why do you think it is appropriate to condemn individuals for the actions of other individuals or groups who claim their common religion as justification?

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 18 Jul 2008 15:21

Rose -- an anecdote in reply to yours.

Some years ago ... like, 20 ... I was driving on the 401, the main highway from Montreal to Toronto and on to the US border. A schoolbus going too fast was passing a line of cars, and the kids were having a fine time, hanging out the windows flashing the peace sign at the drivers they passed, and you could see from their faces that they were getting a good response. I saw that the bus was from a First Nations community in the area, and the kids were "Indian".

So when they passed me, I grinned slyly and raised my right fist in the power salute.

A dozen faces went blank and slightly stunned. Then one kid got it, and word spread, and three seconds later they were all waving their fists at me and smiling and yelling.

Now, through a windshield I might pass as aboriginal -- brown hair and eyes. So they might have thought I was an activist of their own, and been pleased to meet me, and absorbed a little pride from the gesture.

I hoped they recognized me for the whitey I am, and took this as a gesture of solidarity that might have stayed with them. One whitey gesturing solidarity could have made a difference to something, somewhere sometime. Which would have been pretty fine for 10 seconds of my time.

KeithInFujairah

KeithInFujairah Report 18 Jul 2008 16:20

Living in a Muslim country, I have contact daily with Muslims. I have spoken to them to some degree about their religion, and was surprised by some of the answers I received.
Islam acknowledges Christianty, and there are actually similarities between the Bible and the Quaran. Some I have spoken to wish that they like us had a "New" (testament) version of the Quaran, one that brought things up to date.
One collegue was sick, and on returning he told me it was Gods Will, and that something good would happen to him sometime as a result.
If they did something wrong, God would punish them at a later date.

This is very unlike me to post on the subject of religion, but like others, I do not believe Muslims should all be tarred with the same brush as the terrorists.

Going back into my shell now.

Deanna

Deanna Report 18 Jul 2008 16:33

I think that the abuse of anyone on a train , bus, queue..... wherever.... is disgusting and says more about the abuser than the abused.

To come back Eldrick, and point out the disgusting things which are done in the name of religion does not alter the fact that two people were being openly abused while going about their own business.
The cruelty and abuse inflicted on others by the intolerance of others, does not excuse my behaviour if I am being intolerant.

Deanna X

Roxanne

Roxanne Report 18 Jul 2008 16:39

You are so right,Deanna!!

No Excuse, I have to say it frightens me to see such venom thrown at one section of society,it has certain similarities to what happened In Germany!

Have we not learnt from that,I think schools should be taught what happens when Intolerance and Ignorance prevail.