General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

So is this why Shannon Matthews wasn't returned ho

Page 0 + 1 of 2

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

PinkDiana

PinkDiana Report 3 Apr 2008 13:15

Stepfather remanded over images

Mr Meehan faced charges of possessing indecent images
The stepfather of former missing schoolgirl Shannon Matthews has been remanded in custody over charges of possessing indecent images of children.

Craig Meehan, 22, of Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, was arrested at the family home on Wednesday and appeared before the town's magistrates on Thursday.

He was accused of 11 specimen charges of possessing indecent images graded at levels one to four of seriousness.

Prosecutors alleged there were 140 indecent images on two computers.

No application for bail was made at the hearing.

Shannon, nine, was missing for 24 days after failing to return from school.

Packed courtroom

Michael Donovan, 39, of Lidgate Gardens, Dewsbury, has been charged with her kidnap.

Friends of the Matthews family packed the courtroom to listen to the allegations against Mr Meehan.

The bespectacled stepfather wore a black Manchester United shirt with the name Ronaldo on the back and spoke only to confirm his name, address and age.

He stood to listen as magistrate Wayne Perriman remanded him in custody.

Cumbrian Caz~**~

Cumbrian Caz~**~ Report 3 Apr 2008 13:17

Hello Pink,


The piece of scum.......

Sorry, no other words, but I bet i wont be the only one to feel this way,


Caz xxxxxxxxxx

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 3 Apr 2008 13:18

I don't think Shannon will go back to the family home in the foreseeable future.

There had to be a good reason why she was not returned home within a day or two of being found and this arrest seems like a good reason to me.

Kath. x

Rose

Rose Report 3 Apr 2008 13:21

her mother has seen her sometime today by my paper .
he is the scum of the earth ,
dont think shannon would be let back , if theres any chance mother , stays with him
. ....................rosexx.........

AnnCardiff

AnnCardiff Report 3 Apr 2008 13:25

filth, scum, not worthy to draw breath!!

Jean Durant

Jean Durant Report 3 Apr 2008 14:01

Just knew there had to be a good reason why Shannon was not reunited with her family but certainly didn't forsee this(((

Poor little girl. I do hope she is in a happy environment.

Can't say what I think should be done to Meehan as this is a family site.

Jean x.

Kay????

Kay???? Report 3 Apr 2008 14:09


Well I knew he was not all he seemed just a feeling I had about him,,,,,,,,in which I won a £5 bet,,,

I hope this situation didnt reach a stage of progression..ie groomimg...



just do away with him and everyone like him....

Ingrid

Ingrid Report 3 Apr 2008 14:36

poor little girl whats this world come too?
hang him and everyone like him NOW

Purple **^*Sparkly*^** Diamond

Purple **^*Sparkly*^** Diamond Report 3 Apr 2008 14:42

Strange that Shannon had to go missing so this could come out, wonder what they found on any other computers taken for examination? Now maybe we know why Shannon wasn't happy to go home . Her mother apparently has a two year old by this lowlife, and some of her other children live with their father, as does Shannon's brother live with Shannon's Dad.
I think this woman needs to learn to put her kids in front of her sex life and stays single for a while to nurture them all through this.
Lizx

Far too many women lurch from one relationship to another, producing more children each time and then wonder why their own kids don't cope well with life. I know how hard it is to be a single mum but if you can't cope alone, don't keep having more children.

Forgetmenot

Forgetmenot Report 3 Apr 2008 14:43

All I can say on this matter is, thank god Meeham doesn't have children of his own, well I hope he doesn't.
The mother needs to step back and think about her children before letting another guy move in with the family, but then I'm sure S Services will make sure she adheres to the rules, I hope all of her children are made Wards of the Courts if they stay with her which they will providing she hasn't been implicated with Meehan on the porno stuff.
I know its hard being a single mum as I've been one. But childrens needs come before anyone elses.

Gillie XX

Stan

Stan Report 3 Apr 2008 14:50

Theres something about that family that doesn't seem right.How many fathers have the kids got?

PS Shannon has not gone back to her mother yet WHY?

Shady Lady

Shady Lady Report 3 Apr 2008 14:53

They did say the pornographic images were not of Shannon or her siblings,not that it would have stayed that way if he had not been found out,I bet he would have got round to her eventually.

Maddyxx

LanarkshireLassie

LanarkshireLassie Report 3 Apr 2008 14:54

Hi Pink.

This has been a strange one from the off.

I know we should not judge, but the police would seem to be vindicated in their reason for not returning Shannon home.

But as a child, Shannon will only want to be with her mum...wee soul.

Gail x

ChrisofWessex

ChrisofWessex Report 3 Apr 2008 14:59

Gillie - I think you will find that he is the father of the youngest child if memory serves me correct.

PinkDiana

PinkDiana Report 3 Apr 2008 15:07

I completely agree that the police knew exactly what they were doing!!

A friend asked me the other day what I thought and I told him it was just plain weird that she wasn't returned home...... I'm so proud of our Police force for keeping her away!!

xx

MrDaff

MrDaff Report 3 Apr 2008 15:22

Maybe her *abductor* was her *place of safety*, poor little mite, that she is.

*Maybe* he has been kept in custody to protect him from vigilante groups, cos the police feel he was trying to protect not hurt her.

Maybe he wanted to abuse her at some stage..

But it is only this 22 year old who has so far been actually accused of any crime involving indecency and children. I find it informative that the abductor so far hasn't been charged with anything other than abducting.

And you are absolutely right, Pink, I think the police have done exactly the right thing for this little girl.

Love

Daff xxx

Forgetmenot

Forgetmenot Report 3 Apr 2008 15:27

Chris then all I can say is OMG! I hope to god that little one never sees him again!

Gillie XX

Susan719813

Susan719813 Report 3 Apr 2008 16:09

What a pity that Shannon has had all this publicity with photos in the paper. It will be difficult for the poor lamb to get back to a normal life among her peers. Wherever she goes from now on she will be recognised.


Susan
x

Margaret

Margaret Report 3 Apr 2008 22:23

What will this vile being get a slap on the wrist.If he stole a few thousand pounds from a bank he would be sent down for years.I think its about time we got our priorities right. Castrate them for starters,then release them into the hands of the public. The children whose lives they distroy are not given any consideration by them. They are low life and should be treated as such. A friend of mine use to castrate pigs on a farm she said she would do it for nothing

eRRolSheep

eRRolSheep Report 3 Apr 2008 22:34

Two points.
Firstly, what happened about being innocent until proven guilty - are we not all setting ourselves up as judge, jury and executioner?
If he is guilty then let us hope he gets the punishment he deserves but until that happens let us not sway opinion - including that of potential jurors.
Secondly, is there not something wrong about a mother who has a relationship with a very young chap many years her junior? Instead of clamouring for the return of her daughter should we not be looking at those facts too?