Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Joe'Y Isley folkstone kent

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

John

John Report 27 Jan 2010 21:33

everyone has helped and i apreciate that they have.

what dosent help is i dont have any 100% acurate facts to give yet

i have no proof

Freewheel

Freewheel Report 27 Jan 2010 21:37

You say you have the whole adoption file - if the father's name is not recorded there, I'm not sure how you can ever hope to verify his name.

Please confirm whether this is the case..............

John

John Report 27 Jan 2010 21:42

Back to Joe, isle (pronounced ighley) he lived and grew up in Ingoldsby road folkestone kent england around 1955 he would of lived there.


i have in the adoption file only one mention of the fathers name- john james lucky.

all other fathers name entries state not known.

one entry states moved abroard.

LadyKira

LadyKira Report 27 Jan 2010 21:59

What you may need to do is find out if there are re cords at the nearest localstudy library to Folkestone, Every one on hear would love to help but we cannot work without a starting point.
Could I clarify

Joe is your father and it is his father that would be around 90 now.

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 27 Jan 2010 22:21

Oh no, for the love of ...

We're back to John James Lucky?????

http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1199676

-- a thread which By No Means reflects the work FannyByGaslight and I did on this one.


John
21st January 2010 18:33

looking to trace my fathers bloodline.
he was born robert paul ellse dob 9/4/55

mother- irene elsse age 17 british shop worker. father- john james lucky age 21 british driver

adopted by mother irene ellse at 1 month old most of the adoption papers state father unknown

i have seen 1 refrence of father john james lucky any help or info please on him or his father.

now i have been informed by irenes brother that the man i seek is not a john james lucky

but he is a man from folkstone

-------------------------------------------------------------------------



"i have in the adoption file only one mention of the fathers name- john james lucky."

So now you've decided that is not the father of your father. The father of your father is someone named Joe__ Isle or Isley or Heysley (which certainly is not pronounced "ighley" I think) ...

Where are you getting this "information" from?????

Look, you started out saying this:

"need to find the father of a man named joe'y isley. if hes still alive he would probably be about 90"

Nobody knew who was suppoesd to be about 90 -- J. Isley or his father. Now it seems that what you meant was:

"I need to find J Isley, who would be about 90, who is the father of a man."


So now it has taken us to PAGE 2 of this thread for you to get around to saying that you HAVE a name for the father of the person whose father you are now saying is J. Isley?

Who the &%$# is J. ISLEY???


Hmm ... and *now* I see this bit from your previous thread --

"now i have been informed by irenes brother that the man i seek is not a john james lucky but he is a man from folkstone"

has been added at some time since Viv and I worked on your thread. You apparently contacted the person here at GR I recommended you contact.

But neither Viv nor I nor anyone else knew you had changed the opening post in that thread, because we had no reason to look back at it, since you did not add *a new post* to it that would have *shown* us there was something new.

I'm sorry, but you are not even attempting to make sense. Enough.