| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
LizRees
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 10:58 |
|
Hello everyone, Does anybody know why I can't find the 1861 census returns for the Woodstock/Bladon area? I have searched by Enumeration district via Ancestry and can't find it.
Am I going mad, or has it been lost?
I'm researching James Maisey/Mazey/Massey b. Woodstock/ Bladon/Cassington Dec 1851, married Mary Ann Breakspear Mar 1872 and died Sep 1929 (James' & Mary's deaths registered in same month & year).
One thing that confuses me: there are 2 consecutive birth entries on FreeBMD for James Maisey Dec 1851 Woodstock Vol 16 p 150 and Vol 16 p. 151 - are they the same person? I guess only way to find out is via birth certs.
I am trying to prove that James is the son of William Mazey b. Hanborough, Oxon 1815. I have William on all census 1841-1901 except 1861. He and his wife Elizabeth (1816-1859) had 10 children, but they don't all appear together on any one census.
In 1851 William & Elizabeth have Stephen, Elias, Walthan, Sarah and John. On 1871 census Wm. had new wife Jane and 3 sons James, Thomas & Mark. If I could see the 1861 census I could see whether these are the same families.
Wm's occupation (gamekeeper) and birth place/date are consistant in both censuses so I think it highly likely they are the same family. But I'd like to see the children from the 2 censuses together in 1861 to be sure.
Any thoughts would be most welcome. Thanks Liz
|
|
Freewheel
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:02 |
|
Many 'pieces' of 1861 have not survived.............
|
|
Freewheel
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:03 |
|
Have you checked the image(s) for the births?
|
|
Freewheel
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:06 |
|
There are definitely two birth entries - very clear and unambiguous
|
|
LizRees
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:08 |
|
Hi Freewheel,
Yes, I have checked the scanned images (for James, that is). They are consecutive on the list, and with the consecutive page numbers 150 and 151. The handwriting is nice and clear, no ambiguity there.
Liz
|
|
Freewheel
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:10 |
|
1871 has only this one
Name: James Mazey Age: 19 Estimated birth year: abt 1852 Relation: Son Father's Name: William Mother's Name: Jane Gender: Male Where born: Cassington, Oxfordshire, England Civil parish: Blenheim Town: Blenheim County/Island: Oxfordshire Country: England Registration district: Woodstock Sub-registration district: Woodstock ED, institution, or vessel: 12 Household schedule number: 117 Household Members: Name Age William Mazey 50 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Gamekeeper, b. Handborough Jane Mazey 55 born Yarnton James Mazey 19 Thomas Mazey 17 Mark Mazey 15 What is the father's occupation from James's marriage cert?
|
|
LizRees
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:10 |
|
Freewheel, you beat me to it checking the scans.
I have tried looking for baptisms on parish records on IGI, but no luck.
Liz
|
|
LizRees
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:14 |
|
I haven't bought any certs for this family (limited funds!) but of course that would be the ideal way to find out.
Parish records for Bladon don't seem to be easily accessible online, sometimes you can see people's occupations from those.
One confusing Bladon parish record is for Mark Maisey b. 1856 with parents William and Sarah. Perhaps that's a different family, though.
Liz
|
|
Lindsey*
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:14 |
|
It might just be a double entry, have you looked at the original page ?
It's not often names on my tree crop up but I have a handful of Oxford Maiseys right on the edge somewhere. I have seen other trees with them on, try putting him into search trees and you might find a contact.
|
|
LizRees
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:19 |
|
Hi Lindsey,
There's a member of Ancestry with this family in his tree, but I fear he has added names and details without standing back and looking at all the facts. I've noticed a couple of things that don't look right, so am planning to contact him.
Will check the GR trees - thanks for suggestion.
Liz
|
|
Freewheel
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:24 |
|
1851?
Name: Elizebeth Marsey [Elizebeth Maisey] Age: 34 Estimated birth year: abt 1817 Relation: Wife Spouse's name: William Gender: Female Where born: Handborough, Oxfordshire, England Civil parish: Bladon County/Island: Oxfordshire Country: England Street Address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View image Registration district: Woodstock Sub-registration district: Deddington ED, institution, or vessel: 6 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 43 Household Members: Name Age William Marsey 34 b. Handborough Elizebeth Marsey 34 Stephen Marsey 13 Eliza Masey 12 Welthon Masey 7 Sarah Masey 4 John Masey 2
|
|
Freewheel
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:27 |
|
I've posted censuses purely for info................
|
|
Barbara
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 11:35 |
|
Surname First name(s) District Vol Page
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marriages Sep 1864 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bason Jane Oxford 3a 859 Brooks Louisa Oxford 3a 859 Dallaway William Oxford 3a 859 Masey William Oxford 3a 859
|
|
LizRees
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 12:13 |
|
Freewheel - thanks for posting the census - it might help others. It also shows the variations in surname spelling. That, added to the fact that there are so many Maiseys (especially Williams and Jameses!) in Oxfordshire just makes our job more ... interesting??
Barbara - thanks for marriage date - I will look into that one. Just proves my point above! I had William marrying Jane Langford in Mar 1862 (Chipping Norton) - but this might not be correct.
Thanks everybody for your helpful input,
Liz
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 15:25 |
|
Liz - Just looked up rg9/903 at the NA, and there's no mention of any of this piece being lost, so my vote is for your going mad.
|
|
Freewheel
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 15:32 |
|
Which ED is covered by RG9/903?
It isn't transcribed on Ancestry
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
19 Dec 2009 20:30 |
|
Liz - vote retracted
3wheel - just checked and you're right - nothing showing on Ancestry
Previously when I've looked up stuff it's said "(missing)" or something like that, but it didn't here - what I see is (after editting some junk out):
RG 9/903 ***Registration Sub-District 2 Woodstock Parish: Wootton Parish: Stonesfield Parish: Combe Parish: Woodstock Parish: Blenheim Parish: Bladon Hamlet: Bladon Hamlet: Hensington(3) Parish: Begbroke Parish: Shipton-on-Cherwell Parish: Hampton-Gay Parish: Hampton-Poyle Parish: Kidlington Hamlet: Kidlington Hamlet: Gosford Hamlet: Thrup Hamlet: Water-Eaton Parish: Woolvercot Parish: Yarnton Parish: Cassington Hamlet: Cassington Hamlet: Worton
However when I click on link I ***ed, I see:
Scope and content Registration Sub-District 2 Woodstock Covering dates 1861 Availability Open Document, Open Description, Closed For 100 years Note WANTING Held by The National Archives, Kew
I first read this as the note was "wanting", but maybe it's the whole piece instead.
|
|
LizRees
|
Report
|
21 Dec 2009 23:09 |
|
Hi Freewheel and mgnv
So sorry to have missed these gems in the past couple of days.
I didn't know it was possible to look up the RG number on the NA as you did, in fact I'm still not sure how you did it, but thank you anyway!
That list of Sub-Districts looks so tantalizing though.
I'm a little comforted by your vote that I'm probably not going mad, but not feeling 100% sane after trying to help ageing parent with Christmas cards at the weekend ...
Many thanks again for your help with the Census query.
Liz
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
22 Dec 2009 01:02 |
|
Liz - go to http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/Default.asp?j=1 There's a box at top left where I can enter rg9/903 Alternatively, I can "search the catalogue" for, say, Bladon, 1861-1861, rg (for 1841-51 code is ho) and get 1 hit:
RG 9/903 More informationParish: Bladon Hamlet: Bladon Hamlet: Hensington(3) 1861
which I can click on to see a bit more abt it.
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
22 Dec 2009 01:32 |
|
Liz - technically that list of places isn't a list of subdistricts, but a list of places inside the Woodstock subdistrict.
Go to freeBMD and find a hit in Woodstock registration district, e.g.,
Deaths Sep 1837 (>99%) BAYLISS John Woodstock 16 94
Now click on the Woodstock link, then the more info "here" link. We see:
WOODSTOCK REGISTRATION DISTRICT Registration County : Oxfordshire. Created : 1.7.1837. Abolished : 1.10.1932 (succeeded by Banbury, Chipping Norton, Ploughley & Bullingdon and Witney districts). Sub-districts : Deddington; Woodstock.
plus a list of places in Woodstock RD, plus where the regos are now. Woodstock sub-RD was rg9/903 in 1861, and Deddington sub-RD was split between rg9/901 & rg9/902. These #s change each census.
An irrelevant aside - they don't change much in Scotland, which had smaller, parish-sized, RDs. I just looked a family up on FreeCEN for another thread. They gave the piece #s as: Piece: SCT1841/164 Place: Rathven -Banffshire, & Piece: SCT1851/164, & Piece: SCT1861/164.
|