Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
MAISEY - Oxfordshire, 1861 Woodstock census
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LizRees | Report | 22 Dec 2009 22:13 |
|
mgnv, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 22 Dec 2009 01:32 |
|
Liz - technically that list of places isn't a list of subdistricts, but a list of places inside the Woodstock subdistrict. |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 22 Dec 2009 01:02 |
|
Liz - go to http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/Default.asp?j=1 |
|||
|
LizRees | Report | 21 Dec 2009 23:09 |
|
Hi Freewheel and mgnv |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 19 Dec 2009 20:30 |
|
Liz - vote retracted |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Dec 2009 15:32 |
|
Which ED is covered by RG9/903? |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 19 Dec 2009 15:25 |
|
Liz - Just looked up rg9/903 at the NA, and there's no mention of any of this piece being lost, so my vote is for your going mad. |
|||
|
LizRees | Report | 19 Dec 2009 12:13 |
|
Freewheel - thanks for posting the census - it might help others. It also shows the variations in surname spelling. That, added to the fact that there are so many Maiseys (especially Williams and Jameses!) in Oxfordshire just makes our job more ... interesting?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Barbara | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:35 |
|
Surname First name(s) District Vol Page |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:27 |
|
I've posted censuses purely for info................ |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:24 |
|
1851? |
|||
|
LizRees | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:19 |
|
Hi Lindsey, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:14 |
|
It might just be a double entry, have you looked at the original page ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
LizRees | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:14 |
|
I haven't bought any certs for this family (limited funds!) but of course that would be the ideal way to find out. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
LizRees | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:10 |
|
Freewheel, you beat me to it checking the scans. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:10 |
|
1871 has only this one |
|||
|
LizRees | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:08 |
|
Hi Freewheel, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:06 |
|
There are definitely two birth entries - very clear and unambiguous |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:03 |
|
Have you checked the image(s) for the births? |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Dec 2009 11:02 |
|
Many 'pieces' of 1861 have not survived............. |
|||