General Chat

Don't hold back Christine, say what you really think LOL

True in a way Fiona, but the monarchy don't have much say in the running of the country any more, we are almost a republic anyway.

Would having an elected president instead of an elected prime minister really be a worse alternative?

I absolutely admire the Queen, what a long reign and how very boring most of it must have been! I love the pomp, the palaver, the horses, the colour, the tradition, the history. Wont be joining Gwynne by the guillotine:-) lol BC XX

I ought to have no hesitation in agreeing with Gwynne. However, I've never really been convinced that republics are any more equitable.

I'll agree with that Gwynne, Ann does do a lot of work, unpublicised too.

I seriously have doubts as to whether Charles is fit to be King, and especially as Head of the Church of England. What kind of example is he?

I know he's a great environmentalist and all that, but even then shows double standards/

Mind you, they make a good tourist attraction.

Outdated, archaic, time it was ended.

ooooooooo teresa a toughy.

im for the princes...........so yes to that.

but not for the others........no no to that.

if william gets the crown next then i,ll be happy.if charles and her gets there first then thats me done.xx

Parasites the lot of them.

Bring on the revolution.

The only one I have any time for is Anne who refused to let her kids have titles and is the hardest working of all the Queen's kids.

She does amazing work with Save the Children.

Gwynne

For or against?




Debate nicely now lol