General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Too much?

Page 0 + 1 of 2

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Mags

Mags Report 16 Jun 2006 17:10

Oh thats a good one Dizzie.

Dizzy Lizzy 205090

Dizzy Lizzy 205090 Report 16 Jun 2006 17:09

Or sumptuously... Liz

Guinevere

Guinevere Report 16 Jun 2006 16:47

Did the ground open up under it, Dan? That's what is implied by 'abyss' - a massive hole in the ground. Gwynne

Sandra B

Sandra B Report 16 Jun 2006 16:46

Daniel :-)p

Daniel

Daniel Report 16 Jun 2006 16:45

I've used lavishly already, good help though. Polly I think you just need an inhaler ;-)

AnninGlos

AnninGlos Report 16 Jun 2006 16:44

Daniel, like it all except 'bountifully', how about ornately or wondrously or magnificently/ Ann Glos

Mags

Mags Report 16 Jun 2006 16:44

Just read through all your thread. Another good word would be Lavishly as opposed to Bountifully! Just a thought!

Sandra B

Sandra B Report 16 Jun 2006 16:41

Comma somewhere,? When read aloud,a bit long ??/

Guinevere

Guinevere Report 16 Jun 2006 16:39

It is a bit too much, I think, Dan Gwynne

Daniel

Daniel Report 16 Jun 2006 16:27

Excuses excuses Mags :-)

Daniel

Daniel Report 16 Jun 2006 16:26

It's good you brought my attention to it Sharon, but is this instance, I'm ok with leaving it. If I ever post anything on here in the future, be sure to tell me what you notice. I might agree.

Mags

Mags Report 16 Jun 2006 16:26

That's the problem, we have no idea of context and how or why this disaster happened. Mags xx

Daniel

Daniel Report 16 Jun 2006 16:24

Definitley pressure. It was designed to take the weight, but not the internal flames of the fires of Hell, or chandelier electrical faults :-)

Computer Blonde

Computer Blonde Report 16 Jun 2006 16:24

Sorry Daniel - I did tell you that I don't know what I'm on about!! Shutting up now...

Daniel

Daniel Report 16 Jun 2006 16:23

Sharon I've got to get thirty-five thousand words! Don't be hair-splittingly pedantic :-)

Mags

Mags Report 16 Jun 2006 16:23

Wouldn't the tower's framework simply have buckled under the pressure' ? or 'Buckled under the weight'?? It seems very flowery for something that was probably viewed with horror. Only my opinion. Mags xx

PinkDiana

PinkDiana Report 16 Jun 2006 16:22

That's the word Dan!! xx

.•:*:•. Devishly Angelic Juliecat & Panda..•:*:•.

.•:*:•. Devishly Angelic Juliecat & Panda..•:*:•. Report 16 Jun 2006 16:22

Perfect :-)

Daniel

Daniel Report 16 Jun 2006 16:21

Nah, not beautifully - that's just common. How about, luxuriously?

.•:*:•. Devishly Angelic Juliecat & Panda..•:*:•.

.•:*:•. Devishly Angelic Juliecat & Panda..•:*:•. Report 16 Jun 2006 16:20

Diana's right, it doesn't sound right. Try beautifully instead.