General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

If you are interested

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

supercrutch

supercrutch Report 16 Dec 2012 15:06

http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/suggestions/thread/1315893

JustJohn

JustJohn Report 16 Dec 2012 15:10

Don't think OP will get rr'd here. My theory is that they cant open links. Or contribute to threads either. ;-)

Porkie_Pie

Porkie_Pie Report 16 Dec 2012 15:22

As per usual John, your theory is wrong

The link to the thread is fine, Why is your first assumption always that a thread/post would/would not be RR'd



Roy

supercrutch

supercrutch Report 16 Dec 2012 16:35

A friend mentioned the Freedom of Information Act today and if it could be applied to GR and the information they hold concerning who is RRing and the reasons given.

Needs a bit more digging to see if we can ask but how revealing that could be if GR do have to respond.

aivlyS

aivlyS Report 16 Dec 2012 16:39

Well that would just be fantastic..lol

JustJohn

JustJohn Report 16 Dec 2012 16:41

Good shout, Sue. GR does seem to review these rr's quite thoroughly now compared to a couple of months ago. So an irritation only.

But I was out at a certain place (have the plan if any doubting Thomjases or Thomasines wants it copied :-D) and was really annoyed when I tried to read a thread. Could hardly find one to read in its entirety :-( :-(

AnninGlos

AnninGlos Report 16 Dec 2012 16:41

does the freedom of information overule the data protection act? 'cos that is what they'd probably throw at you.

supercrutch

supercrutch Report 16 Dec 2012 16:48

Dunno Ann, that's why it needs a bit more investigation. However if I ask about RRing that only applied to me it doesn't compromise anyone else other than the person/s doing the RRing and the reason they are giving.

If the reason is not true (and patently some of my posts do not contravene anything in the T & Cs) and the RR is upheld and I get the usual warning they would have to explain to me why they upheld the complaint. That would make a change from the 'we cannot discuss individual cases' stock reply.

Kense

Kense Report 16 Dec 2012 16:50

The FoI act at present applies to public services. There is a demand to include private companies that provide services to the public sector.

supercrutch

supercrutch Report 16 Dec 2012 17:14

Thanks Ken.

If members are happy with the status quo then they have never been RRd for absolutely no good reason and that includes genuine newbies FGS.

If I RR I tell the poster why I did. *lightbulb moment* over on suggestions.

TheBlackKnight

TheBlackKnight Report 16 Dec 2012 20:07

You could just forward your concerns to Bright Solid directly & inform them of what has been going on for a long time now. Many members have asked for proper 24/7 moderation as GR staff rarely ever deal with the real problems that accur, They just give out bans without reading the threads. If members inform GR of any problem an e-mail is sent from GR saying they will look into it & nothing gets done about it. So if the members start to go directly to Bright Solid maybe things will start to be done if paid up members ask.