General Chat

On news they are going to sue the french magazine for printing the photos of Kate.

Am glad, everyone deserves privacy and they have enough of photos when they are on duty.

good for them - these sneaky photgraphers with there high powered lenses are a menace

I read on the net that any damages they would have to pay would more than be covered by the money they will make from publishing the photo. I would rather that they ended up grossly out of pocket

By chance I just came across on google where they reckoned the photographer and the chateau is just visible in the background and the french editor said you could see Kate from the street!

Good for them:))...Hope William & Kate win:)

The French editor said "l can't see what all the fuss is about" !!

jude

she and her brother in law should learn to keep their clothes on .........
as for partying, its not wartime when you could be dead tomorrow!!
they are supposed to be royals, fgs...........

Bob

But they were on holiday fgs....bless em, on private property:))

on holiday?

just think if your new daughterinlaw went off on holiday, and the first thing you see is pictures of her with her tits out?

how would YOU feel?

ok my garden is private property..........does'nt give me the right to parade around in the altogether does it?

oh! no.......I'm male...........

not allowed.........

OO Bob you are annoyed are'nt you...lol....If in a relatives garden with permission, on holiday, l'm sure they asked for permission, but of course if they had the place to themselves it was up to them ..... and it would'nt bother me if my daughter wanted to sunbath nude royalty or not.
Private property is just that, Private and they can do within reason as they want, they obviously thought they HAD PRIVACY, but some nasty little photographer sneaked up on them....sick!!

But it WAS'NT private was it?

else how could they have got the pictures?

they should respect their position, she's likely to be our next Queen....

Bob

Their used to be a name for people who went around sneaking a look at and taking pictures of other enjoying their private down time,




They where called Peeping tom's

Roy

Maybe so, Roy,

and what of the people that buy these pictures,and papers or magazines,

the general public........they must be of the same ilk.......peeping toms

Can't argue with that Bob,

I would not dream of paying for papers or magazines to see such things,

I stopped buying such rubbish in the 70's

Roy

Ok Roy, but surely these lads saw what happened to their mother.......she was hounded to her death by the paparazzi,
have they not learned anything?.
Im not saying dont enjoy life or youth, but just be bloody careful where/when you are doing it...........
Bob

Initially the impression was that the sneaky little or large photographer was hanging around and had to get up close to take photo's, so hardly a view for everyone on the street. Also the walls and tree's etc looked pretty secluded to me:)

l don't think much of the people who buy the magazines and papers,:((...but thats their choice!

Nite nite:)

jude :-)

Ni nite......Jude....sleep well....

Just glad i was not a celeb or of royal blood when i was younger

The paparazzi would all be driving top of the range Rolls Royce's, Flying around in their private jets and retired millionaires at 30 years old ;-)

Roy :-D

As I understand it, they were on a private holiday in a secluded villa. They are a married couple. If they choose to walk round stark naked in their own home, that´s their business.
Every time I go to the beach at least 50% of women are topless.... particularly the French, Germans & Italians & because it´s not illegal in Spain, there are often groups of completely nude people on the public beaches. I find it incredibly offensive especially in front of small children, but these people have the right to do as they choose, even in public.
I would have thought that the papparazzi would have learned their lesson.