General Chat

"Since the Chamberlain case, proven cases of attacks on humans by dingoes have brought about a dramatic change in public opinion. It is now widely accepted that, as the first inquest concluded, Azaria probably was killed by a dingo and that her body could easily have been removed and eaten by a dingo, leaving little or no trace.

Crucial to the change in public opinion was a string of dingo attacks during the late 1990s on Fraser Island off the Queensland coast, the last refuge in Australia for isolated pure-breed wild dingoes. In the wake of these attacks, it emerged that there had been at least 400 documented dingo attacks on Fraser Island alone. Most were against children, but at least two were on adults.[26]

In April 1998, in a scenario strikingly similar to the story told by Lindy Chamberlain, a 13-month old girl was grabbed by a dingo and dragged from a picnic blanket at the Waddy Point camping area. In this case, the child was dropped when her father intervened."

?

remeber the case but guilty ?dont know as I dont know the habits of dingos,,,,,,I supose there is always going to be some that could injure a baby under certain circumstances,

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-17150393


maybe this will help you decide

There's a lot to this case, I remember bits and pieces, from way back but then it was considered very unlikely that a dingo would have done it, but since then there have been incidents of dingo attacks that contradict the earlier opinions.

I think in this case like many others, mentioning no names lol, the couple came across as a bit 'odd' and that put even more doubt in people's minds?

three quaters of me thinks the dingo did it
and the other quater has no idea

I have no idea on this one as I haven't read into the case at all. x

AFTER SEEING THE NEWS

i wondered what you thought did the dingo kill the baby
or was it the parents or somebody or something else

WHO DID IT????? you decide