Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Robinson
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
♥Athena | Report | 18 Oct 2007 12:20 |
|
Oh yes, not sure if you already have the 1871 info for Thomas and Hannah - but the only couple I found that seem to fit were living with Samuel and Mally Robinson in Lancs. Thomas is listed as "son" and Hannah as "dau in law". But no children with them. Not sure if this is your couple or not - any idea? |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 18 Oct 2007 12:18 |
|
Sorry for delay - had some work to do. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 11:10 |
|
Athena, I think I will try the 1881 census where Elizabeth is a domestic servant. Do you have the name of her employer. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 11:04 |
|
Kath, Seems not to be any of these. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:59 |
|
These are the only Mary Robinson's born Clitheroe in 1869 +/- 10 years in the 1871 census:- |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:58 |
|
Ok, I've located Thomas and Hannah on the 1881 Census in East Ham - no Elizabeth living with them there, so the entry I found for her working as a dom serv could well be the right one then. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:49 |
|
Kath, |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:47 |
|
Sorry, Margaret - could you give a recap of what has already been covered in the past so that we don't end up duplicating info you already have. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:45 |
|
Reg, Yes I am back on the old trail again after a long lapse.!! |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:44 |
|
Margaret - she was a domestic servant. Not an unusual occ for a young girl but I wouldn't dismiss that 1881 entry just yet. Another thought is that her age of 24 yrs in 1891 might not be 100% correct either! |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:44 |
|
Looking at the 1891 census, there is a 10 year gap between Elizabeth and the next sibling. Could Hannah be Thomas's second wife, in which case there would be a different mother in earlier census years? |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:43 |
|
Reg. Yes . |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:42 |
|
This is all very, very familiar............ I seem to recall that Thomas wasn't her father.............. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:41 |
|
Athena, Sorry another senior moment. I see she was a domestic servant. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:39 |
|
She is down as Elizabeth E Robinson in 1891 |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:39 |
|
Kath. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:38 |
|
Athena. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:37 |
|
Thanks Margaret, but that's not the address you give in your first post. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:36 |
|
1891 census Father Thomas Henry |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 18 Oct 2007 10:35 |
|
|
|||