Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1841 Look up please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:53 |
|
Ok Julie, thanks so much for your time and help. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:49 |
|
Sorry, Rosie...There is just nothing jumping out |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:40 |
|
The children I have listed for Esther & Timothy are: John 1811, Hannah, 1812, Thomas, 1816 & Richard 1832 all born in Sandal Magna, Wakefield, apart from Richard - Crofton, Wakefield. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:35 |
|
Rosie |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:31 |
|
Again, I think that's an error on the census, it should be stepson (to head of house Joseph Potts) and not son in law. I have marriage details for Esther & Timothy - 15th Oct 1810, Sandal Magna |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:27 |
|
Was Thomas Hampson Hannahs husband and Hannah is absent and Thomas is a Widow |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:26 |
|
Right. Thanks so much for tring Julie. I'll try and investigate further then. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:24 |
|
Rosie |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:22 |
|
Only 2 comes up the Yorkshire one her husband is William |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:20 |
|
No, I put Esther Hanson, 1791, Yorkshire into the search and she's right at the top of the page, I just can't access it. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:18 |
|
Ok..In the 41 you saw a Mary Hanson, who you think might be Esther |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:11 |
|
Sorry once again Julie, missed this vital information: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:07 |
|
Rosie |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:03 |
|
Thank you, please bear with me, my computer's running really slow. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:01 |
|
Rosie |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 11:00 |
|
Sorry, should have mentioned, the surname is spelt wrong on the 1851 (hampson) & possibily on 1861 too. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 10:54 |
|
Rosie |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 10:53 |
|
Hi Julie, |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 10:49 |
|
Can't see her, do you have them on the 1851 |
|||
|
Rosie | Report | 10 Sep 2007 10:39 |
|
Good morning all, |
|||