Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
William Brigham & Margaret White marriage c1859/60
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Abby | Report | 9 May 2025 17:16 |
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marcus | Report | 9 May 2025 15:34 |
Oh, penalties for Births !! I knew it was somthing like that, just couldn't remember. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 May 2025 21:39 |
1875 was when penalties came in for not registering BIRTHS. |
|||
|
Marcus | Report | 7 May 2025 18:27 |
KathleenBell, yes I agree wih you about the levels of Non Conformity in the area as a lot of my ancestors were non conformists, eg - Methodism crops up a lot in the family.. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 May 2025 16:31 |
The marriage should still have been registered with the civil authorities……..IF one took place. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 7 May 2025 16:29 |
An aweful lot of people in Northumberland in those days were non-conformist so if your couple were then you won't find the marriage in the ordinary parish records. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 7 May 2025 15:23 |
George Brigham certainly didn't marry Margaret White in 1861 . |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marcus | Report | 7 May 2025 13:31 |
Alviegal, Do you mean William Black? |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 7 May 2025 12:25 |
Re the marriages. I think the extra name should be William White. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 May 2025 08:57 |
Freebmd shows five names with the vol 10b and page number 453 - clearly this cannot be accurate - your supposition AG is certainly feasible.. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 7 May 2025 00:17 |
The only Brigham bridegroom's marriage registered in Berwick in Sep qr 1861: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marcus | Report | 6 May 2025 20:49 |
Thank ErikahH, the baptism entry for William looks good. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 6 May 2025 20:46 |
1841 William is with family on Holy Island |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 6 May 2025 20:44 |
Order the cert of the marriage posted by greyghost……..I think you can include both names on the form. Easily checked on the GRO site |
|||
|
Marcus | Report | 6 May 2025 20:41 |
Correction from me about census..... - |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 6 May 2025 20:23 |
William’s baptism is on FMP |
|||
|
Marcus | Report | 6 May 2025 20:08 |
I looked up Margaret's GRO entry, she is on page 291, the previous entry to George who is on page 292 ! Both are September 1859. |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 6 May 2025 19:31 |
?? Married post daughter Margaret's birth, but Margaret given the Brigham surname |
|||
|
Marcus | Report | 6 May 2025 19:28 |
Thank, will take a look... |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 6 May 2025 19:11 |
Perhaps one of them was married to someone else…………………. |