Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Marriage of James Mead 1892 St Austell UPDATE

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 19 May 2012 12:21

Jude - could you post that 1911 for us?

EDIT: Is this it?

MEAD, James Head Married19 years M 42 1869 General Labourer Plynton Devon
MEAD, Mary Wife Married19 years F 42 1869 House Duties St Stephen Cornwall
MEAD, Rhoda Daughter Single F 18 1893 Sweet Factory St Stephen Cornwall
MEAD, John Son Single M 16 1895 Haulier Probus Cornwall
MEAD, Emma Daughter Single F 14 1897 School Probus Cornwall
MEAD, Eliza Jane Daughter Single F 12 1899 School Probus Cornwall
MEAD, George Son Single M 9 1902 Newport Mon
MEAD, Gracie Daughter Single F 6 1905 Newport Mon

RG number: RG14 Piece: 31964 Reference: RG14PN31964 RG78PN1840 RD587 SD2 ED5 SN185

Registration District: Newport
Sub District: Newport
Enumeration District: 5
Parish: Newport

Address: 80 Hewertson St Newport Mon County: Monmouthshire

HeyJudeB4Beatles

HeyJudeB4Beatles Report 19 May 2012 12:19

I don't have the certificate for the marriage of James Mead

This is the freebmd entry


Marriages Mar 1892 (>99%)
HANCOCK Mary St. Austell 5c 170
Mead James St Austell 5c 170
Philp Richard St. Austell 5c 170
Williams Mary St Austell 5c 170

For some reason I have "assumed" that it was Mary Hancock and gone backwards on a Hancock line. I honestly do not know why I made that decision.

I can find births for both Mary Williams and Mary Hancock in St Austell (the registration district for St Stephen's Cornwall which she gives as her birthplace in censuses) that fit time-wise

They had seven children of which six had survived in 1911. However all born before 1906 so no on-line indices show mmm. And I don't have any of the birth certificates.

So before I send for any certificates does anyone have a view on this for me? Any thoughts shared greatly appreciated!!