| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Sharon
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 19:05 |
|
good evening i was wondering if anyone could help i am looking for a marriage of joseph kilmer/kilner to a mary ? their first child was born in approx 1837 in nottingham . i have notts marriage disc no sign on there i have looked on family search no luck there and freereg joseph was from ireland and mary nottingham so i am presuming they married notts any help or suggestions appreciated sharon
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 19:19 |
|
Hi Sharon, could you give us some more info, like their birth years, occupation, where they were in 1841, etc?
Are there any birth registrations for their children? - certificates should give Mary's maiden name. Like this one:
England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 Name: Emily Kilner Date of Registration: Apr-May-Jun 1848 Registration district: Nottingham Inferred County: Nottinghamshire Volume: 15 Page: 389
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 19:23 |
|
Is this them in 1851?
KILNER, Joseph Head Married M 60 1791 Framework Knitter Ireland KILNER, Mary Wife Married F 46 1805 Lace Runner Nottinghamshire KILNER, John Son M 14 1837 Whip Maker Nottinghamshire KILNER, William Son M 11 1840 Scholar Nottinghamshire KILNER, Anne Daughter F 7 1844 Scholar Nottinghamshire KILNER, Emily Daughter F 2 1849 Nottinghamshire
Piece: 2132 Folio: 695 Page: 34 Registration District: 34 Civil Parish: St Mary
Address: 8, Wat Street, St Mary, Nottingham County: Nottinghamshire
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 19:29 |
|
According to the Kilner family tree on Ancestry, Mary's maiden name was Taylor but there are no marriage details given.
|
|
Sharon
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 19:30 |
|
hi marieceleste joseph born 1792 ireland mary 1805 nottingham what i am trying to find out is one of my ancesters elizabeth leatherland born 1840 is listed as niece to mary in the 1861 census and was trying to find if mary was a leatherland before marriage i was hoping to find the marriage as i did not want if i could help it to spend £9.20 as i need 2 others certificates which are a bit more important at the moment and it starts getting rather expensive thanks
|
|
MarieCeleste
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 19:32 |
|
Sharon, we might have crossed in our posts! See my note above about Mary possibly being a Taylor.
They may have married just before civil registration commenced in which case you would need parish records.
|
|
Sharon
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 19:34 |
|
sorry you were rather quick for me, taylor oh i wonder if she was married before she married joseph thanks for your time marieceleste
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
18 May 2012 21:09 |
|
Could they have been married BEFORE 1837??
The eldest child shown on the 1851 census was born ca 1837 ......... but he is only 14, and Mary is 46 while Joseph is 60 ................. which means they were quite old when they had John.
There could be older children who are not living at home by 1851
sylvia
|
|
Cheryl
|
Report
|
19 May 2012 03:06 |
|
Hi Sharon,
I have looked into your Elizabeth Leatherland, born about 1840 in Nottinghamshire. I am not sure if any of this info is helpful, but it may give you a few extra lines to research.
On the 1861 census, you said Elizabeth Leatherland was living with your Kilner/Kilmer family.
On the 1851 census, Elizabeth is living with different Aunt and Uncle - an Elizabeth (Leatherland) Bailey and William Bailey. The Aunt Elizabeth also has her mother living with them. The mother's name is Ester Leatherland, born about 1787 in Nottinghamshire.
On the 1841 census, Elizabeth Leatherland (b. about 1840) is living with her parents Thomas (b. 1809 Leicestershire) and Mary Leatherland. They are recorded incorrectly under the surname Southerland. (I looked up her siblings and she had brothers John (b. 1831),Thomas (b. 1838) and Joseph (b. 1846) all born in Nottinghamshire. The mother Mary dies sometime before 1851 (1847?). The father Thomas Leatherland's parents were Thomas Leatherland and Esther unknown.
I could find birth extracts for 7 children born to Thomas Leatherland & Esther. They were: John & Sarah b. 1810 Leicestershire (twins?) Elizabeth b. 1813 Nottinghamshire Ann b. 1815 Nottinghamshire William b. 1818 Nottinghamshire George b. 1820 Nottinghamshire Harriet b. 1822 Nottinghamshire (this extract is recorded under Litherland) Selina b. 1824 Nottinghamshire
There is also their son Thomas, b. 1809 Leicestershire, but I could not find a birth extract for him.
I am not an expert in genealogy and the above information is just my speculation on who your Elizabeth Leatherland (b. 1841) may be. I just thought that sharing this information may be of some use to you.
Good luck,
Cheryl
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
19 May 2012 03:55 |
|
It looks as though Thomas Leatherland (b.ca1809) married Maria/Mary Baxter
"England, Marriages, 1538–1973 ," Thomas Leatherland, 1830 Groom's Name: Thomas Leatherland Groom's Birth Date: Groom's Birthplace: Groom's Age: Bride's Name: Maria Baxter Bride's Birth Date: Bride's Birthplace: Bride's Age: Marriage Date: 20 Sep 1830 Marriage Place: Radford,Nottingham,England Groom's Father's Name: Groom's Mother's Name: Bride's Father's Name: Bride's Mother's Name: Groom's Race: Groom's Marital Status: Groom's Previous Wife's Name: Bride's Race: Bride's Marital Status: Bride's Previous Husband's Name: Indexing Project (Batch) Number: M04664-1 System Origin: England-ODM Source Film Number: 504529, 504530, 504531 Reference Number:
Source Citation
EDIT ..................... a Public Family Tree on ancestry has Mary Rodgers as Thomas Leatherland's wife and mother of Elizabeth b.ca 1840.
sylvia
|
|
Sharon
|
Report
|
19 May 2012 12:23 |
|
hi cheryl thankyou very much your information it is correct. i cannot as yet though work out how elizabeth is neice to mary kilmer a little more searching to be had. i have nottingham cds (marriages) that go back before 1837 but no luck in finding one between mary and joseph. thankyou sylvia for your help as well thomas leatherland did marry mary rodgers she died in 1847 dec and a son edwin was born in dec 1847 so i am presuming her death was due to his birth thanks once again sharon
|