Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Marriage lookup 1853
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 18 May 2011 22:24 |
|
Because the handwriting is poor...........on close inspection of the original image of the 1861 census, you can see why the name Nathan has been mistransribed as Mathew! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 18 May 2011 19:39 |
|
1861 as posted before |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 18 May 2011 19:36 |
|
so it seems his name was Nathan not Mathew |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 18 May 2011 19:12 |
|
?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 18 May 2011 16:55 |
|
This could be Isaac born 1859 ish No ages unfortunatly |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sally | Report | 18 May 2011 16:48 |
|
This address is in the area, Theres a son missing but he could be anywhere |
|||
Researching: |
|||
Marked as Answered |
|||
|
jax | Report | 18 May 2011 16:44 |
|
Its is easier finding the address on FMP |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sally | Report | 18 May 2011 16:40 |
|
Was their an address at all Jax??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 18 May 2011 16:32 |
|
Yes Thats why I mentioned it but it could be wrong but the ages all match up |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sally | Report | 18 May 2011 16:28 |
|
Hi Jax |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sally | Report | 18 May 2011 16:27 |
|
Hi Joy |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joy | Report | 18 May 2011 16:20 |
|
Sometimes less is better than more, if you see what I mean, just putting one person's full name or surname and the other's first name. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 18 May 2011 16:14 |
|
could this be them in 1871 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sally | Report | 18 May 2011 16:06 |
|
I have his son William's marriage cet date 1872. Isaac down as father but not deceased??? Thats why i asked! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sally | Report | 18 May 2011 16:03 |
|
Hi Safc |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PricklyHolly | Report | 18 May 2011 16:01 |
|
At least you know now why Isaac could not be found in 1871! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Abby | Report | 18 May 2011 16:00 |
|
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1854 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sally | Report | 18 May 2011 16:00 |
|
Hi Joy |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 18 May 2011 15:59 |
|
Deaths Sep 1867 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Abby | Report | 18 May 2011 15:56 |
|
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
Marked as Answered