Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1901/1911 Census look up please

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Kim

Kim Report 17 Apr 2011 16:25

Thanks for looking anyway.


LondonBelle

LondonBelle Report 17 Apr 2011 16:53

Just found this marriage....don't know whether this throws the cat amongst the pigeons or not!

Name: Elizabeth Ann Staines (Spinster)
Age: 33
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1885
Spouse Name: Frederick George Hyatt (Batchelor) occ Soldier
Spouse Age: 34
Record Type: Marriage
Marriage Date: 10 Jan 1918
Parish: St Andrew, Enfield
COUNTY: London
Borough: Enfield
Father Name: Charles Stephen Staines occ Sawyer
Spouse Father Name: Thomas William Hyatt occ Gardener

Address for Elizabeth is 1 Batley Road Enfield (same as 1911 census)

Witnesses: Ethel Hyatt & Thomas Staines

LondonBelle

LondonBelle Report 17 Apr 2011 17:03

This is the marriage in 1911..... father's name is James not Charles Stephen

Name: Annie Elizabeth Staines
Age: 22
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1889
Spouse Name: Robert William John Waller
Spouse Age: 22
Record Type: Marriage
Marriage Date: 10 Sep 1911
Parish: St James, Upper Edmonton
COUNTY: London
Borough: Enfield
Father Name: James Staines
Spouse Father Name: William John Waller



Kim, do you know which marriage is right?

Kim

Kim Report 17 Apr 2011 21:37

Thank you Catherine for your message.

Umm now you got me thinking.

I was told by a family member that had purchased the 1911 marriage cert that that one was correct marriage but I would say your 1918 marriage is DEFINITELY the correct one and ties in with not only the name and occupation of the father but the birth that Glitter Baby found for me earlier. I had over looked the birth because I was looking for the names the other way round.

This is why I always like to double check things and never believe anything until it can be proved!!!

I will come back tomorrow to see that you saw this message.

Thanks for your help
Kim

LondonBelle

LondonBelle Report 22 Apr 2011 15:42

Thanks for coming back, Kim. Sorry I haven't responded sooner but this tends to be hobby for high days and holidays! Pleased you think you are now on the right track. If there is anything else you think we can help you with, please let us know....