Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1851 census Lancs or Yorks please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Frances | Report | 29 Jan 2010 11:11 |
|
This is my final fling on the Cock family! |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 29 Jan 2010 11:20 |
|
1851 no idea if correct |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 29 Jan 2010 11:29 |
|
Good morning Glitter Baby, I think this Thomas is most likely - age correct, birthplace correct and occupation as 1841. Does he by any chance say he is a widower? |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 29 Jan 2010 11:36 |
|
Hannah is wife born Clevershire, Lancashire |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 29 Jan 2010 11:39 |
|
I think that Hannah maybe a second marriage |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 29 Jan 2010 11:56 |
|
The only name like Clevershire in Lancs is Cleveleys near Blackpool and multimap doesn't recognise the place either. IGI is not producing any Hannah Simpsons from that area but perhaps it is her second marriage also. |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 29 Jan 2010 11:58 |
|
Would you like the 1851 image? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 29 Jan 2010 12:06 |
|
Thanks for the offer Maureen but Hannah isn't an ancestor, only a curiosity! It's the sleuthing addiction taking over.... |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 29 Jan 2010 12:14 |
|
Sorry no idea on that one |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 29 Jan 2010 12:20 |
|
It's from the G.R. single line census - halfway down the Home page. Where I do all my look ups! |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 29 Jan 2010 12:24 |
|
Which census - 1841 or 1851 etc ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 29 Jan 2010 12:25 |
|
Sorry, I should have said, 1851 |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 29 Jan 2010 12:26 |
|
Okay found it 1851 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 29 Jan 2010 18:04 |
|
if you use lancashirebmd.org.uk for lancashire deaths all those which are transcribed have the death age regardless of year of death |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 29 Jan 2010 18:07 |
|
possible Jane which would make the age of 20 (rounded down) seem possible |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 29 Jan 2010 18:17 |
|
is this Thomas in 1881 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 30 Jan 2010 14:59 |
|
Thank you lancashireAnn, a most useful tip. 30 in 1847 tallies with her suggested birth year of 1813. |
|||