Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
birth look up please sorted thank you all
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
michael2 | Report | 25 Sep 2009 10:56 |
|
hi netty thank you for that i do understand what you are saying i will not put any thing on my tree until i am sure it is correct have to wait until i get cert. msc |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 25 Sep 2009 10:24 |
|
msc, not sure if this will help but, when searching on the 1911 census, the District/County that are shown in the search results that come up are where the people are living, not, where the people were born. The children, Annie, James & Thomas were living in Dartford at the time of the 1911 census, it doesn't state that they were born there, but, they may have been, as no birthplace is given for them on the image, if you understand what i mean !. I'm going now before i confuse you any further lol. |
|||
|
michael2 | Report | 25 Sep 2009 09:52 |
|
thank you everybody you have all given me a lot to think about. thank you very much. msc |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 25 Sep 2009 09:31 |
|
This is the information off the 1901 image found above by Quinsgran. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 25 Sep 2009 02:06 |
|
1911 census. |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 25 Sep 2009 00:09 |
|
Seeing as they are in Woolwich in 1901 there's also this: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 25 Sep 2009 00:07 |
|
There's certainly room for Laura between Hector and Annie. I wonder where she is? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
michael2 | Report | 24 Sep 2009 23:52 |
|
hi rose what i ment to say it does not say where on the 1911 house hold transcript but if i enter his name seperately it says dartford 1908. i have not seen that one i will have to see what i can find out. msc |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 24 Sep 2009 23:51 |
|
There aren't too many Coxalls born Dartford so I agree that Jim must be the one. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
michael2 | Report | 24 Sep 2009 23:48 |
|
hi rose it does not say but when i put his name only it says dartford 1908 if this makes sense. msc |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 24 Sep 2009 23:33 |
|
MSC, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
michael2 | Report | 24 Sep 2009 22:23 |
|
hi birdsinanest thank you. msc |
|||
|
Wildgoose | Report | 24 Sep 2009 22:21 |
|
I hope the birth certificate turns out to be the right one. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
michael2 | Report | 24 Sep 2009 22:12 |
|
hi birdinanest thank you for your reply i have only just started on this side of the family i have not got as far as looking for marriages . msc |
|||
|
Wildgoose | Report | 24 Sep 2009 22:05 |
|
I really doubt that James would be mistranscribed as 'Jim' but it is possible that is what his parents named him when they registered his birth. Perhaps later on they decided to be more formal for the census and recorded him as James. If you have followed his life through forwards, if I am making sense, was he Jim or James on his marriage certificate, for example? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
michael2 | Report | 24 Sep 2009 22:00 |
|
hi thank you for your reply,s the reason i asked for the look up was so i can get the the birth ref to send for the cert i did pay for the transcript and he is on it . i have looked for the ref,s on free bmd also on ancestry they do not appear on either of the i think it must have been mistranscribed as jim i will have to send for that cert to see if it is the right one . msc |
|||
|
Wildgoose | Report | 24 Sep 2009 21:58 |
|
In the message above mine, msc says 'I did pay to see the transcript'. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Wildgoose | Report | 24 Sep 2009 21:47 |
|
I'm a bit puzzled. If you paid for the 1911 transcript and saw the siblings' birth place can you not see James' also? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
michael2 | Report | 24 Sep 2009 21:43 |
|
hi all idid see jim coxall dartford on free bmd wonder if it,s been mistranscribed, i did pay to transcribe and got the family his sister annie and brother thomas where born in dartford thats why i thought he was born in dartford will try the advanced and see what happens. msc |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 24 Sep 2009 21:28 |
|
Im assuming you have found him on the 1911 census but havnt paid to see the transcript. |
|||