Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Is there any way forward???
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 14:18 |
|
Just to let you know I have just ordered Jane's death certificate. I don't suppose it will add any useful info but any concrete evidence for this family is welcome! Thanks for finding the ref. for me Michelle. Jayne |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 13:56 |
|
sorry, I missed the later postings. Choccy I don't think either of these marriage are my Thomas Troke. Most of his male rellies seemed to work in the tin industry and there are several Thomases in the family. Thomas was definitely with a Jane in 1871 and that is the name on the childrens' birth certificates - the problem is that on each of the 3 certificates her name is different, DIXON, DICKSON and DICKINSON. Without her father's name I have no idea how to progress with her ancestors. Jayne |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 13:49 |
|
I have to pop out and do domestic things for a while but an ENORMOUS THANK YOU to everyone who took the time to help me and especially to RamblingRose who went way beyond just helpfulness. THANK YOU. Jayne |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 13:25 |
|
I have to pop out to the shops now but would like to say an ENORMOUS thank you to all of you who helped but especially to RamblingRose who went way beyond helpfulness. THANK YOU. Jayne |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 16 May 2009 13:12 |
|
Have found this Thomas Troke (mis-transcribed as Feke). He is the one who married Eliza Voisey in 1852. |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 16 May 2009 13:10 |
|
Hi Rambling Rose |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 16 May 2009 13:08 |
|
Just to let you know I have sent image of 1911 census to Jayne it IS the right one :) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 16 May 2009 12:58 |
|
Think it could be your Jane in Southwark cos there is also an Alfred Troke in Southwark with correct birthyear.Looks like living in same household. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 16 May 2009 12:55 |
|
Are either of these marriages anything to do with your Thomas? |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 16 May 2009 12:51 |
|
The 1911 Jane is Southwark and this looks like her death |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 16 May 2009 12:47 |
|
Jayne have PMd you... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 12:41 |
|
Hi Rose, where was the possible Jane in 1911. It seems to me that she could have been anywhere in the UK given their travelling record. If there is one faintly possible I will buy some credits and spend a wet saturday afternoon catching up on some of my other family puzzles |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 12:31 |
|
Maybe Rose but I can't find one marriage for Thomas let alone 2! But I suppose it would explain the gap between George and Alfred and there's nothing to suggest that he'd marry the second Jane as he apparently didn't marry the first. |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 16 May 2009 12:25 |
|
There are only 3 jane trokes on 1911 and only one is likely re DOB...but not location |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 16 May 2009 12:21 |
|
Jayne, re marrying two Janes being unlikely...well, no lol..I had a heck of a time with my gt gt grandfather's wife Annie ( I knew she was Annie before researching...and couldn't work out how she could still be on a census after she died! He married within the year of her death, another Annie...so may be worth thinking about |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 12:09 |
|
Just another problem on this elusive Jane - I can't find her death either! She was still alive in 1901 but I haven't bought credits for the 1911 census yet. I believe Thomas died 1909 and awaiting the cert. from GRO |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 12:06 |
|
My thinking on a marriage before 1861 is - that as there are 3 children close together born c. 1866, 68 and 70 they were obviously rather fertile so there would have be 2 or 3 more children prior to those three. |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 16 May 2009 11:55 |
|
my thinking on that was it might help to find him if he was mistranscribed on 1861, to see if he was married by then...but can't find him... have tried obvious mistranscriptions of name if anyone can think of something else? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jayne | Report | 16 May 2009 11:46 |
|
Hi RamblinRose, in 1891 andi1901 he was a gas meter maker, in 1871 he was a tinplate worker in 1851 he was a tinman (sound like something from the Wizard of Oz!) |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 16 May 2009 11:29 |
|
what was Thomas's proffession ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||