Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
can't find a marriage
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 21:53 |
|
Only glad to help. |
|||
|
Maz (the Royal One) in the East End 9256 | Report | 18 Mar 2009 21:34 |
|
Hi girls and thank you sooo much for finding that marriage - my friend is over the moon! |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 20:37 |
|
They didn't start having children until after 1891, this makes me think as they married in 1888 that her first child was born/lost around this time and she's recovering with her parents....? |
|||
|
GRMarilyn | Report | 18 Mar 2009 20:22 |
|
Tracey |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 20:00 |
|
Marilyn |
|||
|
GRMarilyn | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:53 |
|
Tracey, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:50 |
|
OK Maz, this is a classic error... Ancestry have mistranscribed Rosina, on the image she is very very clearly a Stock and listed as married. It's a very basic error, always check the image to make sure it matches the transcription. Ancestry is very very good at these!! |
|||
|
GRMarilyn | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:49 |
|
Well done Tracey...... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:45 |
|
Here's Rosina in 1891.... She's married and living with her parents?? Possibly visiting them? Maybe this is when her first child has died and they are helping her through the turmoil? |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:39 |
|
GOT THEM !!!! |
|||
|
GRMarilyn | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:32 |
|
Walter Stock. either married Elizabeth Rayment or Ethel Mirriam 1898 West Ham. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:25 |
|
Ahhh, well FreeBMD are missing some pairings, i'm going to take a look at the full pages and see what comes up! |
|||
|
GRMarilyn | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:21 |
|
Tracey, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:20 |
|
I have found a Walter Stock married in 1891 to an Elizabeth! lol |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:19 |
|
Interestingly, the original image on the 1911 has his name overwritten from William to Walter... |
|||
|
Maz (the Royal One) in the East End 9256 | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:16 |
|
am off for my dins and to deal with the kids now so please excuse me if I don't reply for a while ... |
|||
|
Maz (the Royal One) in the East End 9256 | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:15 |
|
thank you Tracey, I didn't expect anyone to spend credits on this though! they are both shown as single in 1891 so I don't think a marriage in 1888 is feasible. think they were telling porkie pies. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:15 |
|
Marilyn |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:08 |
|
1911 census states 23 years married. |
|||
|
GRMarilyn | Report | 18 Mar 2009 19:06 |
|
Thats Funny, |
|||
Researching: |
|||