Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Tubby - THANK YOU!

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 7 Feb 2009 23:36

had a problem with Lindsey's posting!!

marriage registration was


Marriages Mar 1858 (>99%)

BUGG Elizabeth Clerkenwell 1b 486
Pullen Elizabeth Ann Clerkenwell 1b 486
Rushton Henry Anthony Clerkenwell 1b 486
Tubby William Henry Clerkenwell 1b 486




sylvia

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 7 Feb 2009 23:31

is this him in 1851???


1851 Census

Name: William Tubby
Age: 13
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1838
Relation: Brother-in-law
Gender: Male

Civil Parish: Bermondsey
Ecclesiastical parish: St Paul
County/Island: Surrey
Country: England

Registration district: Bermondsey
Sub registration district: Leather Market

Richd Leech 26 b.ca 1825, Southwark, Head, Mother Elizabeth, Drapers Porter
George Leech 24 b.ca 1827, Kinglsand, rorther, French Polisher
James Tubby 15 b.ca 1836, Newington, Brother-in-law, French Polisher
William Tubby 13 Brother-in-law, (no occupation given)
Edwin Tubby 6 b.ca 1845, Lambeth, Brother-in-law, Scholar
Elizabeth Tubby 51 b.ca 1800, St Pancras, Middlesex, Married, Mother

Address:- 1 West Street, leather Market, Bermondsey





Brother-in-law was a term commonly used in those days for stepdaughter, stepson, and presumably here for stepbrother



sylvia

 Lindsey*

Lindsey* Report 7 Feb 2009 23:19

BUGG Elizabeth Clerkenwell 1b 486
Pullen Elizabeth Ann Clerkenwell 1b 486
Rushton Henry Anthony Clerkenwell 1b 486
Tubby William Henry Clerkenwell 1b 486

MrsBucketBouquet

MrsBucketBouquet Report 7 Feb 2009 23:19

1901 England Census
about William H Tubby
Name: William H Tubby
Age: 39
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1862
Relation: Head
Spouse's Name: Elizabeth A
Gender: Male
Where born: St Luke, London, England

Civil Parish: Clerkenwell
Ecclesiastical parish: St Mark
County/Island: London
Country: England

Street address:

Occupation:Cab proprietor/stable

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status: View Image

Registration district: Holborn
Sub registration district: Goswell Street
ED, institution, or vessel: 1
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 458
Household Members: Name Age
William H Tubby 39
Elizabeth A Tubby 40 born bedford bedfordshire.


Goswell Street is the bottom end of Islington....close to Clerkenwell

Marriages Mar 1858

BUGG Elizabeth Clerkenwell 1b 486
Pullen Elizabeth Ann Clerkenwell 1b 486
Rushton Henry Anthony Clerkenwell 1b 486
Tubby William Henry Clerkenwell 1b 486


 Lindsey*

Lindsey* Report 7 Feb 2009 23:17

Do you know when and where they married ?

**chrispy**

**chrispy** Report 7 Feb 2009 23:01

Sylvia has found them in 1861 . They are only lost in 1901 now!!
Help still needed!!

LOST -my Tubby family, ie Elizabeth Ann Tubby and William Henry Tubby. I have them in1871/1881/1891 and 1911(so I know they were still alive then, living in Lewisham) but cannot see them in 1861 or 1901. Can you help?
William was born in abt 1838 in London( Holborn or Islington) and Elizabeth abt 1835. In 1861 he would be 23, in 1901- 63. Elizabth a few yrs older. Elizabeth was born either Middlesex or Ashford Kent, censuses vary. William Henry was a cab proprietor (there were lots of Tubby children who later seemed to take over the business in Claremont Mews). Where are they in 1861 and 1901. Are they transcribed as something else? I've tried to find them with help but we cannot see them!!
Can you help?
Chris
Only lost in 1901 now.