Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1911.....

Login to Add Reply Watch This

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

KempinaPartyhat

KempinaPartyhat Report 1 Jan 2009 23:43

Sylvia ...thats the family ......

Catherine Jones married william G Pogson
had Edith then Kate Jane
Kate jane had catherine charlotte williams

She was registered kate Jane Pogson at birth yes
d .Williams
Edith williams

KempinaPartyhat

KempinaPartyhat Report 1 Jan 2009 23:50

1 marriage of Kate Jane to william Henry Williams ....

Without this I cant go back down his tree


2 where did Thomas gorden Wolstencroft go .........is just coz I,m nosey!!!!


3 where is kates death registration

without this I cant find where is is buried ......again just nosey

bob

bob Report 2 Jan 2009 00:23

Just for the record its not Kate Pogson who changes her name, she seems to be with two differant men.

Bob.

bob

bob Report 2 Jan 2009 00:52

Kemp.
Most the info you have had in the past 12 hrs is what I was trying to give you, but because you took so long to answer I gave up. The thread that appeared this afternoon regarding a 1904 marriage, was similar to yours, I replied to you and the other one, NO reply was received from either, I sent an email to YOU and the other person requesting further info, but the other person replied yesterday after nearly 3 months, then you go on to say that I am being nasty to my friend, if you read the answer, all it says is ( if you had given this info earlier you could have had the answer 3 Months ago). Threads are held in the bank on the left of the screen, they are there till you delete your bit, which is why I have replied to yours & hers.
I, am NOT a nasty person nor do I wish to upset anyone, if you have difficulties then so be it, I was only trying to help you. I have given my summary of your thread and to be quite honest do not want to enter into any other threads that you may have in the future, we are here to help each other as far as Ime concerned.

No Doubt I will get plenty of Flack, but to be honest I dont think that my message was off hand, after all Ive replied to messages sent in 2004, and they havnt been annoyed, If you look at the tread I replied to there were NO NAMES, only a marriage in 1904, which turned out to be 1901.

Enough said, etc,.

Bob Peters.

KempinaPartyhat

KempinaPartyhat Report 2 Jan 2009 13:35

Bob ...you have lost me now ...I dont have any marriages in 1904 or 1901 ......

I havent recieved an e-mail or pm from you as I always answer them ..........straight away ..UNLESS they are about my family tree then I check the details on this site and my hard copys at home first ...

Sorry

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2