| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
KempinaPartyhat
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2008 22:46 |
|
could you please help me as I,m stuck again with this family ... Kate married Thomas Wolstencroft in 1909 and had 4 children in 1912 13 16 18 with a man called William H Williams ....How do I search for her or him on 1911 census ......as I have tried with the batches that are avaliable and have found his family and hers BUT not them any of them !!! Any ideas would be looked into Thanks
|
|
KempinaPartyhat
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2008 23:05 |
|
The info you need to find them will be as follows but I dont think its fair to ask others to look when it cost so much ....I,m happy to pay the cost but need help as to where and how to look when one lady KATE POGSON born 1882 keeps changeing her name ........
Thomas Gordon Wolstencroft born 1880 Married Kate 17th Feb 1909 Motor engineer lived at 21 Larkhall Rise till he went ??????
william Henry Williams born !!?? unknown BUT fathered Kate first child in 1912
What I would like to know is what would she be down as ????
This is ALL LONDON
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2008 01:48 |
|
You can only search on exact surnames with no wildcards. If Wolstencroft has been misspelled, there is no way of finding it.
I'm not having any luck finding my relatives either.
Rose
|
|
Margaretfinch
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2008 06:49 |
|
I have found a family on the 1911 with the name mispelt I just kept putting in different spellings and found them living at the same address as in 1901
Margaret
|
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o°
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2008 07:21 |
|
Sorry Kemp, I can't find then. Try again after the 3 Jan when the census is officially released. Maybe by then we will be able to use wildcards which would help
Bob I agree that people should stay near there computer when they post a request for help however your question did come 3 hours after the original post & it was 1.30am. It is unreasonable to expect anyone to sit for that length of time or in this case all night to monitoring a thread
|
|
Bobtanian
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2008 09:57 |
|
NONE of my family name appear, yet there should have been at least 8 of them in London on 1911. Its seems, I suspect that the family name MAY have been Aliased as French, Therefore they appear double barrelled as XXXXXX FRENCH , but not as the actual name,
food for thought......? Bob
|
|
KempinaPartyhat
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2008 18:17 |
|
Many many Thanks for your kind help again .....
Bob ......I have 4 children one is autistic ......aged 22 one is sick with the sickness bug and the other two are wrapping presents to help me ....... I,m very sorry not to be here at 1.30 am but as you MIGHT have guessed I managed to get my 22 year old into bed and am waiting for the other to dash to the bathroom!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry to keep you up !!!!!
Bob ...my family are ALL in LONDON and I,ve found many of them on the bit that has been released to the public at present .....
Questions ......what do you feel you need to know that hasnt been covered ...?????????????????? Kate POGSON ...maiden name
Married Thomas Wolstencroft 1909 Father of her first child William Henry Williams
WHAT NAME WOULD SHE BE UNDER IF SHE DIDNT DIVORCE THOMAS !!!!!????????
So I can look for her !!!! MYSELF
|
|
KempinaPartyhat
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2008 18:38 |
|
Claire ...what I did do was just put in the surnames and it gave me all of them and that then told me his brothers and sisters and parents are still at Larkhill Road.........but no sign of Thomas
|
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o°
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2008 20:06 |
|
I tried about 10 different versions of Wolstencroft with no forename but still no sign of your Thomas
|
|
Ivy
|
Report
|
25 Dec 2008 10:15 |
|
hi Kemp,
No suggestions for Thomas .......
but if the child born in 1912 is William's, she might well be listed under Williams?
If she is the Kate Jane born in Pimlico to Catherine Pogson in the 1901 census (b approx 1882), then she may be the Kate b approx 1884 in "Pomlico" in the 1891 census?
I can't find a Kate Williams born in Pimlico on the London 1911, but that census has a Kate Jane Williams living in Fulham b approx 1884 in London. One to rule out?
|
|
Vera
|
Report
|
25 Dec 2008 10:33 |
|
Hi Kemp, Have come late to your thread....found this birth any good? You are probably seen it.. Births Jun 1884 Pogson Kate Jane St. Geo. H. Sq. 1a 442
Happy Christmas
Regards Vera
|
|
KempinaPartyhat
|
Report
|
25 Dec 2008 20:07 |
|
Thanks everyone ....you have been helpful....again I didnt use my brain ......and YES she is there on the 1911 census under WOLSTANCROFT ......just took some advice and a long shot and found her ...........She says she is a widow so I guess Good Old Thomas died .....within a year of marrying her ..........LOL ...
BUT I must pass a tip on to you all .....I found her by looking for her sister ....who never married and still in 1911 called Pogson ...there was kate with her
In 1911 Kate was being called Katherine !!!!
I think I like this lady!! Thanks again people for your time and help ...
|
|
bob
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 18:49 |
|
There are These, Katharine F Williams mmn Pogson bn 1912 Chelsea, 1a 710 Evelyn C " " " " " " 1913 St Geo Hanover Sq 1a 732 Diana M " " " " " " 1922 " " "" " " 1a 618
Doesnt seem to be a marriage though.
Bob Peters
|
|
KempinaPartyhat
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 20:09 |
|
READ the post above ........................
Yes these are my family ........
BUT bob ................why was she calling herself many names
Kate Jane Pogson kate jane wolstencroft kate jane wolstancroft katherine Jones wolstancroft K J williams
As we now know she didnt seem to care or ......know who she was
she was widowed by 1911 !!!!????? or just hidding from someone !!! Her father in law was a vicar!
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 21:22 |
|
Kemp
if you are getting all those names from the various censuses, it may be that it isn't KATE who is calling herself by all these different names
.................. but that either the census takers (or whoever filled in the census) didn't hear the name properly, didn't listen properly didn't know how to spell the name(s) etc, and/or the modern day transcriber(s) have mistranscribed what was on the original census!
for example WolstOncroft vs WolstAncroft could very simply be a mis-transcription. Similarly JAne and JOneS
You should ALWAYS look at the census image to check what is on there ................... which means paying big amounts for the 1911 if what I am reading is true.
I can give you one example from my family.
I couldn't find my grandfather on the 1891 census. His name was Schofield, simple eh? After weeks and weeks of searching (and learning lots about how to find an elusive relative), I found the family ............. as Silufield. When I checked the image, it very clearly was Schofield to anyone who knew the name.
Unfortunately, the modern day transcribers have to write what they SEE not what they think it should be.
sylvia
|
|
KempinaPartyhat
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 22:15 |
|
Ok ...let me try to clean this up some
My mum J M H ....born J M Busy Her mother Katherine Charlotte Williams her mothers maiden name Pogson
Her name kate jane williams on Katherines Birth certificate maiden name Pogson formerly Wolstencroft
Katherine then married Stanley Busby and ADDED Wolstencroft to her marriage certificate
Kate Jane born 1882 married Thomas Gorden Wolstencroft in Fed 1909 her marriage to him said she was Kate Jane pogson
1911 census SHOWS kate with her sister Edith Jones Pogson at 60 gloucester Road London (the family home ) Spelling changed for Kate jane wolstencroft to Katherine J wolstancroft
ALL this is only after getting certificates and getting confirmation from cross matching names addresses ect Kate mum also Catherine Pogson MMN JONES died at 60 gloucester Road 1912 with Edith at her side
WHAT I cant find are 1 marriage of Kate jane to ....Mr WILLIAMS 2 Where did Thomas go in 1911....no death reg or place of adode ...YET
Thats all
But I also cant find Kate Janes DEATH reg
Edoth uses JONES coz she was born before her parents were married
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 22:48 |
|
ok
do you have Kate Jane's birth certificate, or even her birth registration?
What is her name on there?
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 22:59 |
|
Bear with me, I'm trying to understand your family, and what you already know.
Is this them in 1901??
1901 Census
Name: Catherine Pogson Age: 50 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1851 Relation: Head Gender: Female Where born: Malleoyed, Montgomeryshire, Wales Civil Parish: St George Hanover Square Ecclesiastical parish: St Gabriel Warwick Square County/Island: London Registration district: St George Hanover Square Sub registration district: Belgrave
Catherine Pogson 50 Lodging House Keeper Edith Pogson 20 b.ca 1881, Pimlico, London, Assistant Kate Pogson 19 b.ca 1882, Pimlico, London, Assistant Emma Coll 32 Servant Charles Coll 1 2 months Mary McClement 6 Annie McClement 41
Address:- 30 Gloucester Street, Blegravia, St George's Hanover Square
and in 1891
Name: Catherine Pogson Age: 46 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1845 Relation: Visitor Gender: Female Where born: Montgomeryshire, Wales Civil Parish: Croydon Ecclesiastical parish: St Michael County/Island: Surrey Registration district: Croydon Sub registration district: Croydon
Evan J Evans 41 Tobacconist Jane Evans 41 Catherine Pogson 46 Married, Lodging House Keeper Kate J Pogson 7 b.ca 1884, Pomlico, London, Scholar Ernest E Lawe 18
Address:- 5 North End, Croydon
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 23:09 |
|
so she was registered as Kate Jane
Births Jun 1884 (>99%) Pogson Kate Jane St. Geo. H. Sq. 1a 442
although of course, this doesn't rule out the possibility that she was baptised Katherine, or that she herself later decided that she preferred Katherine!
Anyone can change their name to whatever they want, and you don't have to go through any legal process.
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
1 Jan 2009 23:16 |
|
May be it was a common-law marriage ........ but when she went to register your mother she was asked her maiden name and if she had had any previous name.
Don't forget, the father did not have to attend at the registrar's, and no-one asked for proof of marriage.
sylvia
|