Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Sarah/Elizabeth Wilcox 1867
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gemma | Report | 29 Nov 2008 22:44 |
|
Hello again...Yet again i'm stuck and after a hand. There is obviously something i'm missing but i'm just so "word blind" i can't think of what to do next. |
|||
|
Lewella | Report | 29 Nov 2008 23:08 |
|
Could she still be unmarried by 1891? This one fits with the 1881 census |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 29 Nov 2008 23:10 |
|
Yes that one could fit. :) xx |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 29 Nov 2008 23:14 |
|
AHHH! Nope. :( |
|||
|
Lewella | Report | 29 Nov 2008 23:16 |
|
I wonder if she gained an extra middle name: |
|||
|
Lewella | Report | 29 Nov 2008 23:17 |
|
Ooops, rats and bugger! :-( |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 29 Nov 2008 23:29 |
|
I thought that too Barbara but she isnt connected... Sarah Anns parents were William and Sarah...and she too had a brother named John William. These Wilcoxs are sent to test me. I do appreciate it but I have looked into her as best as I can and discounted her, even on her marriage certificate it states her father is William. Thanks though. xx |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 29 Nov 2008 23:39 |
|
Sarah Ann Elizabeth was actually born in 1873 6d/165. Where as My Sarah Elizabeth was born in 1867 6d/205 if that helps any? xx |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 30 Nov 2008 00:02 |
|
Cheers Barbara. They are a very confusing bunch. All I can think is that she moved right out of the area and married but I have sent messages to everyone on here with a Sarah OR Elizabeth born within a 5 year difference of mine down as born anywhere in the country just in case they put her place of birth down as where she married because they couldn't find her birth and so far I still have no leads. :( xx |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 30 Nov 2008 00:38 |
|
Maybe if we approach this differently...can anybody find an Elizabeth Wilcox born approx 1867 whos father is Henry who may have been the woman who married Charles Foster? The only ones I can find are in Wales but in 1891 is with her parents and one in Hanley in Staffordshire who is the 20 years younger wife of a Henry...Could Henry also be Isaac? The proffession fits? xx |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 30 Nov 2008 21:24 |
|
please anyone? xx |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 30 Nov 2008 23:20 |
|
Bumping it up t't top. :D xx |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 30 Nov 2008 23:41 |
|
I do love your posting Lewella - says it all!!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 30 Nov 2008 23:43 |
|
1891 England Census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 30 Nov 2008 23:54 |
|
Gemma |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 1 Dec 2008 00:03 |
|
On the mar cert for Elizabeth and Charles in 1888 Charles is 23 and an electroplate worker. |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 1 Dec 2008 00:08 |
|
Gemma |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 1 Dec 2008 00:10 |
|
I had got it Michelle but it is all appreciated as at some point I know we will hit on something I will have overlooked. :) xx |
|||
|
Gemma | Report | 1 Dec 2008 00:13 |
|
Thats what I'm thinking...Its very strange. John Williams marriage I havn't got the certificate for as I didn't need it as I had the birth and the census returns so maybe it might be worth seeing what he called his dad on his in 1885 as Isaac died as Isaac in 1879. |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 1 Dec 2008 00:18 |
|
Gemma |
|||
Researching: |
|||