Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
HELP NEEDED - WALTER SHINN
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Susan | Report | 17 Nov 2008 17:01 |
|
Michelle, |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 17:00 |
|
So in my reckoning, Samuel and Jemima are George's parents. Haqnnah is George's step mother. Both George and Elizabeth and Samuel and Hannah had sons in the same year both called Walter |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:59 |
|
Yes I found that Jemima died 1884 and Samuel married Hannah. |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:58 |
|
Surname First name(s) Age District Vol Page |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:55 |
|
I've got to go and do tea now Susan but I'll look again afterwards if you like |
|||
|
***Michelle*** | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:55 |
|
Hannah on the 1891 has son Walter with her still and he is single.If yours was married 1882 then your answer is this Hannah is not the mother.George and Elizabeth were the parents and also births were not compulsory at the time of his birth so the cert you have is prob for the Walter who belonged to Samuel and Hannah. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:54 |
|
Oh, Samuel Shinn appears to be the father of George Shinn |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:53 |
|
Jeanette, |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:45 |
|
My feeling is that, if you know the marriage cert to be the right one....that is that the bride's details are correct and it ties in with everything else...then George is the father of Walter. |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:40 |
|
I meant Walter of course and not George....doh! |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:37 |
|
Jeanette, |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:34 |
|
Ok, so George did marry Elizabeth....she lies about her age! |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:25 |
|
Bummer! lol |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:20 |
|
Jeanette |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:17 |
|
Potty |
|||
|
}((((*> Jeanette The Haddock <*)))){ | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:12 |
|
Looking at the 1861 census I would say that Elizabeth is George's second wife. There is a son born in 1850 which is far to early for Elizabeth to be the mother. Just trying to find the marriage to support this |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:12 |
|
Lindsay, |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:10 |
|
Hi Susan, |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:09 |
|
When did Walter marry? Have you found him on any census. |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 17 Nov 2008 16:07 |
|
If by any chance both fathers are brothers then you will still be looking at the same ancestors |
|||
Researching: |
|||