Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Ive got a bit of a puzzle here which I can't solve
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Margaret | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:00 |
|
I have Richard Wingrove Corby born 18 August 1889 Newcastle.. (He emigrated to Australia in 1923). As I had his exact date of birth I was able to look on the front page of genes where they list the census years and input his name, year of birth etc. and only one came up that matched. I was then given the details by a member on here. They are: 71 Tamworth Road, Elswick, Newcastle - John Corby 37, Jane 25, Rebecca 5, John 4, Richard 1 and Mary Shepherd 17 (sister in law). I was highly delighted. Not only had I got his fathers name but his wife's surname as well. I have the discs for 1881 and grabbed them quick to follow up on this BUT whichever person I tried to follow up on just did not help. I could not locate MaryShepherd (who would have been 7) , I found a Jane as a servant, could not find father John Corby who would have been abt 27 so I am at a loss. How do I now locate either John Corby or his wife's Shepherd family. I can only think that perhaps some of them would show on 1901 census when they would be John 47, Jane 35, Rebecca 15, John 14 and Richard 11. Has anyone any other brilliant ideas as to how I solve this ? Thanks you. |
|||
|
LD | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:07 |
|
Could this be Rebecca on 1901 ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:12 |
|
|
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:15 |
|
I think this might be John Corby Jnr - again, he is in some kind of institution - the census lists him as a "Boy in Training": |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:18 |
|
This is likely to be Jane, the mother's death entry: |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:19 |
|
Thank you very much Laptop Dancer and Athena. How sad for those youngsters. That's got me wondering now what disease was rampant at that time. Gosh I do feel sorry for them. |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:20 |
|
...and their father, John Corby's death: |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:21 |
|
|
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:22 |
|
looks like Johns death the age seem consistet with being 37 in 1891 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:28 |
|
I appreciate your help. However, this has now prevented me from getting any further back to find John Snr's parents. What a blow. Still, these things happen. |
|||
|
LD | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:29 |
|
Margaret, doesn't necessarily mean there was some sort of epidemic at the time. We all have instances of deaths occuring in families at same time. If one got an illness then others in household would. There was no Boots the Chemist then ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:33 |
|
Margaret |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:33 |
|
Too true Laptop Dancer and when you think of their living conditions, it is no wonder they passed illnesses on to eac h other. Thanks for your reply. |
|||
|
LD | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:34 |
|
I can only find one Corby in Newcastle in 1851 ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:36 |
|
there was lots of TB at that time that was very contagious |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:36 |
|
Further to that, I would suggest ordering the following MARRIAGE cert for John and Jane. That way it will confirm who his father was - and then you will know for sure whether it was Joseph or someone else. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:39 |
|
Athena - many many thanks for that additional information. I agree with you regarding the names, it certainly tio my mind looks like the right family. You have been wonderful. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:43 |
|
Thanks also Athena for the marriage details. I will indeed send for that certificate to authenticate what we believe to be the true facts. Your efforts are much appreciated. |
|||
|
♥Athena | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:45 |
|
You're very welcome, Margaret. Quite enjoyed it! |
|||
|
Whisky Soda | Report | 6 Mar 2008 12:59 |
|
This could be Jane in 1871, but when you get her marriage cert it should confirm it or not |
|||