General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
WOMAN TO BE OLDEST MOTHER AT 63
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ErikaH | Report | 4 May 2006 15:25 |
|
Totally wrong......... As one who was born to a 40-year old mother who died before I was eight, I am 100% opposed to this sort of thing. My father was 46 when I was born...........he died just after my 15th Birthday. I was an only child, and the conception was completely natural.......so there are no recriminations..........only regrets that my parents weren't around for me as I grew up. But how will this poor child feel if he/she is left an orphan at a young age? Reg |
|||
|
Nolls from Harrogate | Report | 4 May 2006 14:54 |
|
Dreadful! the chances of the child being left an orphan by early teens is great therefore its totally selfish of the parents.How will the child cope with his peers theres sure to be some teasing. Norah |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
PinkDiana | Report | 4 May 2006 14:49 |
|
Wrong!! Wrong!! Wrong!! :O( |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 4 May 2006 14:36 |
|
I think its disgusting! The poor child. Christine x |
|||
|
ஐ+*¨^¨*+e+*¨^¨*+ஐ Mildred Honkinbottom | Report | 4 May 2006 14:30 |
|
As said before, I would feel differently if the woman was childless and this was her last hope. But then again I feel there should be an upper age limit of 60 But I think, there should be a cut off point of 50 if the person already has children. Elaine x |
|||
|
Roxanne | Report | 4 May 2006 14:28 |
|
i agree Elaine,Its a very selfish act on her part, She will probably die before the childs even a teenager,thats selfish! |
|||
|
~Messy | Report | 4 May 2006 14:25 |
|
In my view women shouldn't be having babies at such an advanced age, it's completely against nature and very selfish. |
|||
|
Alek | Report | 4 May 2006 14:13 |
|
She already has 2 grown up children, so it's not as though she has never given birth. I've hit my 50's now, personally I would rather slit my throat than go through all that again! Maybe she doesn't want to admit she's getting on in years and she is past childbearing.she needs to see a psychiatrist |
|||
|
Merlin | Report | 4 May 2006 13:54 |
|
I think it,s totally selfish self indulgence,with no thought for the well being and future of the child,it,s alright saying it will be Financially secure,but what about it,s right to have a loving,caring upbringing with parents young enough to do it. Hal |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
DIZZI | Report | 4 May 2006 13:42 |
|
Sorry but i think its awfull, i had two kids would have loved more but thats it so unfair on the child so unfair for childless couples who cant afford to have treatment who crave for just one |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Valice in | Report | 4 May 2006 13:41 |
|
Ar nearly that age, this would be my worst nightmare. Lets hope the government decide she can'r claim for child benefit and her state pension at the same time!! |
|||
|
Baby | Report | 4 May 2006 13:38 |
|
Personally I think,To have a baby at that age is rather selfish,I mean who can say she will still be alive when the 'baby' is 20? If she had no children I could understand,as that longing for a child never goes away. As someone who is still waiting for the day when I can hold my own child in my arms,She should be grateful for the children she already has. BB xx |
|||
|
ஐ+*¨^¨*+e+*¨^¨*+ஐ Mildred Honkinbottom | Report | 4 May 2006 13:34 |
|
Woman to be oldest mother at 63 A woman is set to become Britain's oldest mother at the age of 63 after treatment by a controversial Italian fertility doctor. Child psychiatrist Patricia Rashbrook, of East Sussex, flew to Rome last October for IVF by Severino Antinori, according to the Sun newspaper. She is now reported to be seven months' pregnant with her third child. In a joint statement with her husband, John Farrant, she said the decision had not been taken lightly. The statement read: 'A great deal of thought has been given to planning and providing for the child's present and future well-being, medically, socially and materially. 'We are very happy to have given life to an already much-loved baby, and our wish now is to give him the peace and security he needs.' The couple said they were pleased with the pregnancy 'notwithstanding its unusual and potentially controversial aspects'. Refusing to go into details of the treatment received, the future parents insisted the child's welfare was their top priority and asked for their privacy to be respected. ' It's pretty clear that she would have needed donor eggs because of her age Dr Allan Pacey Secretary of the British Fertility Society ' Dr Rashbrook, whose married name is Mrs Farrant, is reported to have conceived after treatment at Dr Antinori's clinic in Rome, where he specialises in treating older women. He first made headlines in 1994 by helping a post-menopausal 63-year-old woman become pregnant with donor eggs and hormones. And he has said he wanted to be the first doctor to produce a cloned human baby. |
|||
|
ஐ+*¨^¨*+e+*¨^¨*+ஐ Mildred Honkinbottom | Report | 4 May 2006 13:34 |
|
I think this is totally wrong when the mother has already had children. I would think different if the woman was childless. Your opinions please...........<no arguing either lol ! > |
|||