General Chat

*shivers delicately....but then Joy, we will have Anarchy!! lol BC XX

come on mam even you know some people cant help themselves, its not what was said its who said it x

I'm only speculating. But if the person in question was repeatedly reporting the same post or member. It could be deemed as malicious reporting. Then maybe that is why GR gave the ban.

Steve

* Vision of BC standing on a plinth directing the anarchy.... wearing green and gold with her hair streaming in the wind........ wonderful lol

xx

Morning ladies and Stevie !

very true BC and Stray lol

morning Rose xx

GR have had that one in place for a whle steve, a member was threatened with being suspended if she didnt stop reporting so much,and this was 2/3 yrs ago x

~~~ morning everyone x

I must be thick or something but how on earth do you know that someone has already reported?

Well Pat am i glad you typed that question , because like you i must also be thick , :-)
Do they think wer'e mind readers now lol.
I can't be bothered reporting , it takes me all my time to add to a thread lately .

Karen

We wanted moderators so we got "request/review".
So we use "request/review".

What is the point if of using "requesy/revirew" if some of us get suspended?.

Obviously no one at GR is reading the threads in question.

Loose, loose situationj.

I was going to report a certain person but pressed the res x at thr top[ right hand quarter instead and went to bed.

xx

I agree with you Karen - haven't got time. Sometimes I don't like what I read, but it's usually drink talking and I disregard it. It passes off into the ether eventually, so who cares? (Unless it's hurtful to someone - then that's different - it should be reported.)

I have no knowledge of the specifics of this event, I just thought something I've had might be of interest.

A couple of months ago I got *apologies* from GR staff for the deletion of two threads of mine when there were *no grounds* for deletion. They weren't boilerplate emails; they were direct responses to my inquiries.

One thread was about St George, and one was about the Political Compass. In the second case, many people had participated happily and without incident. However, a well-known pair of obnoxoids had attempted to disrupt it (in my absence), and possibly reports about their posts had led to deletion of the thread ... but I suspect there were also reports about the thread itself by people who just take their chances, that if they report a thread/post by me it will get deleted no questions asked.

So any people like that might want to take the heads up, that there may just be a new way of looking at unfounded reports of abuse.

It would be unfortunate if this fresh approach itself got generalized so that people reporting posts that others also reported were treated as if they were part of an organized campaign, just because there so obviously are organized campaigns of that sort hereabouts ...

Nothing changes does it?

Lifes too short to be part of an organised reporting session on an internet forum.

If I see something which I find offensive, be it a post or thread - I report it (If it upsets me enough)

If I see someone in my opinion, breaking the house rules in their behavior towards another person (AKA being bang out of order) - I report them.

I've reported blatent goading on here a number of times, and a few of them times, even though the goading is obvious, GR write back to say they are keeping an eye on the thread and in "this instance" it can stay.

Sometimes it then peters out, sometimes it drags on until it does get removed anyhow & others who retaliate get bans..