General Chat

Could someone do a search for me?
George Langley born c1814 cheshire. I believe only one result come up in the 1861 census.

Tom

Was he married by 1841 census and to whom...???

1861 England Census
about George Langley
Name: George Langley
Age: 47
Estimated birth year: abt 1814
Relation: Head
Spouse's name: Maria
Gender: Male
Where born: Lr Bebington, Cheshire, England

Civil parish: Lower Bebington
Ecclesiastical parish: Lower Bebington
County/Island: Cheshire
Country: England

Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage: View image

Registration district: Wirral
Sub-registration district: Eastham
ED, institution, or vessel: 9
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 129
Household Members: Name Age
George Langley 47
Maria Langley 56




Source Citation: Class: RG9; Piece: 2637; Folio: 29; Page: 25; GSU roll: 543003.

Tha'ts the most obvious but there are other possibilities.

Sue

I think he was born either in Tarporley/Utkinton or Neston in Cheshire, His baptism was in Tarporley 1812.

This George is a Parish Clerk and lived,Park View..next road was Church View.

Well if his baptism was in 1812 then his birth must have been prior so there are other possibilities, Can you give further info?

Sue

Possible Marriage

Surname First name(s) District Vol Page

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marriages Mar 1859 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cooper Mary Wirral 8a 482
Langley George Wirral 8a 482
Richardson Edward Wirral 8a 482
Shallcross Maria Wirral 8a 482
Shalleross Maria Wirral 8a 482

All i know is that he was Born 1812 to William and Mary Langley. They lived in Utkinton, Cheshire. Ive been unable to find him in any census'. Recently i found out his father may be from Neston so i thought he may have been born there whilst his parents were visiting family.
He had a twin brother called James

Tom

Is this his parents and sublings from IGI

Family Group Record
Search Results | Download | Print

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Husband
William Langley Pedigree


Birth:
Christening:
Marriage:
Death:
Burial:





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wife
Mary Pedigree


Birth:
Christening:
Marriage:
Death:
Burial:





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Children

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Joseph Langley Pedigree
Male

Birth:
Christening: 28 FEB 1808 Utkinton, Cheshire, England
Death:
Burial:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Elisabeth Langley Pedigree
Female

Birth:
Christening: 11 NOV 1809 Utkinton, Cheshire, England
Death:
Burial:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. James Langley Pedigree
Male

Birth:
Christening: 23 AUG 1812 Tarporley, Cheshire, England
Death:
Burial:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. George Langley Pedigree
Male

Birth:
Christening: 23 AUG 1812 Tarporley, Cheshire, England
Death:
Burial:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Ann Langley Pedigree
Female

Birth:
Christening: 23 DEC 1821 Utkinton, Cheshire, England
Death:
Burial:


It's possiblee that George and James were twins...

Sue has found the family for you.

This is the correct family yes. i just can find James or george in the census. Nor can i find any death records so i dont know whether they died young or if there are spelling mistakes on the census' making them difficult to find.

Tom

This appears to be Joseph:

1851 England Census
about Joseph Langley
Name: Joseph Langley
Age: 40
Estimated birth year: abt 1811
Relation: Head
Spouse's name: Charlotte
Mother's Name: Mary
Gender: Male
Where born: Utkinton, Cheshire, England

Civil parish: Bickley
County/Island: Cheshire
Country: England

Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Disability: View image

Registration district: Nantwich
Sub-registration district: Bunbury
ED, institution, or vessel: 16
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 15
Household Members: Name Age
Joseph Langley 40
Charlotte Langley 38
Evan Langley 9
Thomas Langley 5
Mary Langley 76
James Langley 21
James Fox 21
George Gibbons 13
Sarah Purcell 24
Alice Davies 17
George Drinkwater 32
Clementina Drinkwater 28
Edward Drinkwater 6
Ann Drinkwater 4
George E Drinkwater 2
George Wilkinson 19
Mary Hewitt 19


Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 2170; Folio: 518; Page: 5; GSU roll: 87157-87158.

Think this is the Parents William and Mary's marriage.

IGI Individual Record FamilySearch™ International Genealogical Index v5.0
British Isles
Search Results | Download | Print

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WILLIAM LANGLEY Pedigree
Male Family


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event(s):
Birth:
Christening:
Death:
Burial:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marriages:
Spouse: MARY HINTON Family
Marriage: 28 JUL 1805 Saint Peter Church Street, Liverpool, Lancashire, England



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Messages:
Extracted marriage record for locality listed in the record. The source records are usually arranged chronologically by the marriage date.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Information:
Batch No.: Dates: Source Call No.: Type: Printout Call No.: Type:

M020955 1805 - 1814 1068923 Film NONE


Sheet: 00

Joseph's marriage.

Surname First name(s) District Vol Page

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marriages Mar 1842 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HUMPHREYS Charlotte Nantwich 19 131
LANGLEY Joseph Nantwich 19 131

Think this is George Langley in,,,,,,his occupation is Parish Clerk.

1871 census - household transcription
Person: LANGLEY, George
Address: Church Road, Lower Bebington

census search results all search results redefine current search
Name Relation Condition Sex Age Birth
Year Occupation Where Born Original
census
image

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGLEY, George Head M 57 1814 Lancashire VIEW
LEE, Samuel Nephew M 15 1856 Lancashire VIEW

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RG number:
RG10 Piece:
3742 Folio:
6 Page:
6

Registration District:
Wirral Sub District:
Eastham Enumeration District:
15 Ecclesiastical Parish:


Civil Parish:
Lower Bebington Municipal Borough:
Address:
Church Road, Lower Bebington County:
Cheshire



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Death of Maria Langley ,,,George's wife.

Surname First name(s) Age District Vol Page

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deaths Mar 1865 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGLEY Maria Wirral 8a 308

Thanks for the info, its been a great help

Tom

Think this maybe George Langley's death even though the age is wrong.

Why,,,if he died and there was only Samuel Lee aged 15 living with George ,,,,Samuel may have had to deal with the funeral and he wouldn't have known exactly how old George was..

I will look in Passenger lists but I don't think George will be there.

Sue

Think this is William Langley's death as Mary his wife is a widow on the 1851 census for Joseph Langley,which Sue put on your thread.

Surname First name(s) Age District Vol Page

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deaths Dec 1845 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGLEY William Nantwich 19 103

Gosh Sue, you have done well, sorry to have left you to it I was busy ranting on my own thread...lol

Sue