Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Darned Ridgway's where are they
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Paul | Report | 17 Jan 2008 12:00 |
|
Wow! this is amazing. thanx for the information. I really do appreciate this. The interesting thing that has come of this is my wifes Grandfather was orphanded at 4 years, so now it begs the question who looked after him. Will have to wait for the 1911 census. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 16 Jan 2008 17:45 |
|
James 38, is a widower on the 1881 census with his son Enoch, 14. He's living with Thomas & Ellen Hadfield where he's listed as brother. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 16 Jan 2008 17:29 |
|
There were 2 James Ridgeway's in the area both around the same age. 1 one the son of Thomas, the other the son of Samuel. |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 16 Jan 2008 17:23 |
|
1861 England Census |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 16 Jan 2008 17:11 |
|
There's this marriage on BVRI: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 16 Jan 2008 16:40 |
|
This gets more intruiging. From the death entry James Ridgway is 55, but that means he was born in 1845. From the census in 1891 that puts him at 44, which makes him born in 1847, yet there is a birth registration in 1848. Difficult finding the pieces to this puzzle, but I suppose James could have been illiterate, and not known. |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 16 Jan 2008 06:18 |
|
Hi, |
|||
|
imp | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:52 |
|
Too Late Keith......lol |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:51 |
|
And the marriage |
|||
|
imp | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:50 |
|
Marriage |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:48 |
|
A possible death for James given age of Arthur. |
|||
|
imp | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:45 |
|
1891 |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:43 |
|
Hi Paul, |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:41 |
|
This looks like it could be Elizabeth and Arthur in 1901, will check image and see what marital status Elizabeth is. |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:41 |
|
Hi Paul |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Jan 2008 14:36 |
|
Seems I got myself a little screwed here, and have probably followed the wrong track and given my wife family that does not belong in her tree. |
|||