Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Darned Ridgway's where are they

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Paul

Paul Report 17 Jan 2008 12:00

Wow! this is amazing. thanx for the information. I really do appreciate this. The interesting thing that has come of this is my wifes Grandfather was orphanded at 4 years, so now it begs the question who looked after him. Will have to wait for the 1911 census.

Thanx again. Paul

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 16 Jan 2008 17:45

James 38, is a widower on the 1881 census with his son Enoch, 14. He's living with Thomas & Ellen Hadfield where he's listed as brother.

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o°

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° Report 16 Jan 2008 17:29

There were 2 James Ridgeway's in the area both around the same age. 1 one the son of Thomas, the other the son of Samuel.
1871 Samuel's son was still single but it looks like the other was married to Betty

1871 England Census
about James Ridgway
Name: James Ridgway
Age: 27
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1844
Relation: Head
Spouse's Name: Belly
Gender: Male
Where born: Bosden, Cheshire, England

Civil Parish: Handforth Cum Bosden
Ecclesiastical parish: Cheadle
Town: Hazelgrove
County/Island: Cheshire
Country: England

Street address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Disability: View Image

Registration district: Stockport
Sub-registration district: Hazelgrove
ED, institution, or vessel: 2
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 30
Household Members: Name Age
Belly Ridgway 26
Enock Ridgway 4
James Ridgway 27
Walter Ridgway 9 months

I suspect the marriage cert of James to Elizabeth Dean will show him as a widower.

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o°

°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° Report 16 Jan 2008 17:23

1861 England Census
about James Ridgway
Name: James Ridgway
Age: 17
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1844
Relation: Son
Father's Name: Thomas
Mother's Name: Martha
Gender: Male
Where born: Borden, Cheshire, England

Civil Parish: Bosden and Handforth
Ecclesiastical parish: Cheadle
Town: Hazelgrove
County/Island: Cheshire
Country: England

Street address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage: View Image

Registration district: Stockport
Sub-registration district: Hazelgrove
ED, institution, or vessel: 7
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 7
Household Members: Name Age
Ann Ridgway 21
James Ridgway 17
Martha Ridgway 58
Sarah Ridgway 15
Thomas Ridgway 55

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 16 Jan 2008 17:11

There's this marriage on BVRI:

RIDGWAY, James Age: 40 Marriage
Wife: Elizabeth Hannah DEAN Age: 23
Marriage Date: 4 Dec 1887 Recorded in: Stockport, Cheshire, England
Collection: St Mary
Husband's Father: Thomas RIDGWAY
Wife's Father: Joseph DEAN
Source: FHL Film 1751857 Dates: 1875 - 1891

Paul

Paul Report 16 Jan 2008 16:40

This gets more intruiging. From the death entry James Ridgway is 55, but that means he was born in 1845. From the census in 1891 that puts him at 44, which makes him born in 1847, yet there is a birth registration in 1848. Difficult finding the pieces to this puzzle, but I suppose James could have been illiterate, and not known.

Paul

Paul Report 16 Jan 2008 06:18

Hi,

Thanx to all for the information. I now know why I had some difficulties as James ridgway was already dead. Interestingly Elizabeth passed away in 1904, which left my wifes Grandfather an orphan when he was 4 years old.

Once again thanx for the help.

imp

imp Report 15 Jan 2008 14:52

Too Late Keith......lol

Gail. x

PS is your internet connection slow again today?

KeithInFujairah

KeithInFujairah Report 15 Jan 2008 14:51

And the marriage
Marriages Dec 1887 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEAN Elizabeth Hannah Stockport 8a 113
GEORGE Emma Stockport 8a 113
RIDGWAY James Stockport 8a 113
THOMAS John Stockport 8a 113

imp

imp Report 15 Jan 2008 14:50

Marriage

James Ridgway
Year of Registration: 1887
Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec
District: Stockport
County: Cheshire, Lancashire
Volume: 8a
Page: 113

Elizabeth Hannah Dean on same page

Gail

KeithInFujairah

KeithInFujairah Report 15 Jan 2008 14:48

A possible death for James given age of Arthur.

Deaths Sep 1900 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ridgway James age 55 Stockport 8a 69

imp

imp Report 15 Jan 2008 14:45

1891

Elizabeth H Ridgway
Age: 26
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865
Relation: Wife
Spouse's Name: James
Where born: Bosden, Cheshire,

Civil Parish: Bosden
Ecclesiastical parish: Norbury St Thomas
Town: Hazelgrove
County/Island: Cheshire

Registration district: Stockport
Sub-registration district: Hazelgrove

Elizabeth Ridgeway 26
James Ridgway 44
Mary Ridgway 2

Class: RG12; Piece: 2807; Folio 38; Page 32; GSU roll: 6097917.

Gail

Vera

Vera Report 15 Jan 2008 14:43

Hi Paul,
Elizabeth is a widow....address 20, Commercial Road.
I must admit I have done exactly what you said.....put wrong anestors on my family tree....easily done.

Regards Vera

KeithInFujairah

KeithInFujairah Report 15 Jan 2008 14:41

This looks like it could be Elizabeth and Arthur in 1901, will check image and see what marital status Elizabeth is.

Name: Elizabeth H Ridgway
Age: 36
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865
Relation: Head
Gender: Female
Where born: Hazel Grove, Cheshire, England

Civil Parish: Hazelgrove Cum Bramhall
Ecclesiastical parish: Norbury St Thomas
Town: Hazlegrove
County/Island: Cheshire
Country: England

Street address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status: View Image

Registration district: Stockport
Sub-registration district: Hazel Grove
ED, institution, or vessel: 2
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 223
Household Members: Name Age
Annie Ridgway 5
Arthur Ridgway 4 months
Edith Ridgway 8
Elizabeth H Ridgway 36
Mary Ridgway 12


EDIT Elizabeth is shown as Widowed. She is a silk weaver.

Vera

Vera Report 15 Jan 2008 14:41

Hi Paul

Any good?
Name: Arthur Ridgway
Age: 4 months
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1900
Relation: Son
Mother's Name: Elizabeth H
Gender: Male
Where born: Hazel Grove, Cheshire, England

Civil Parish: Hazelgrove Cum Bramhall
Ecclesiastical parish: Norbury St Thomas
Town: Hazlegrove
County/Island: Cheshire
Country: England

Street address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status: View Image

Registration district: Stockport
Sub-registration district: Hazel Grove
ED, institution, or vessel: 2
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 223
Household Members: Name Age
Annie Ridgway 5
Arthur Ridgway 4 months
Edith Ridgway 8
Elizabeth H Ridgway 36
Mary Ridgway 12


Regards Vera

Paul

Paul Report 15 Jan 2008 14:36

Seems I got myself a little screwed here, and have probably followed the wrong track and given my wife family that does not belong in her tree.
Anyway here is my problem.
My Wifes grandfather Arthur Ridgway, B:(Oct 1900 Stockport) D:(August 1942 - Simons Town).
Parents: James Ridgway B: Unsure, but think 1870+/-, and Elizabeth Hannah Ridgway( Nee Dean) B: 1864 Stockport (I think). d: 1904.

Problem I have found, is I cannot find any correlation in the 1901 census of James ridgway, and Elizabeth Hannah Ridgway with young Arthur.
I believe what I may have done is linked another James Ridgway 1845 to Elizabeth, and gone off track from here onwards.

My question is this. Has any one ever come across, or in this case ever not found relatives, that should have been in the census??
Am I searching the census incorrectly?
Any ideas??