Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Missing in 1891/1901 census...ALBERT EVANS, Birmin

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Margaret

Margaret Report 9 Oct 2007 19:15

Perhaps you could help me find this Chap/family, please..

I am looking for ALBERT ROBERT EVANS, b1878 in Birmingham. He married in 1899 & his age is given as 21. He was a Fitter by trade. His father is given as AUGUSTUS HENRY EVANS, an Engine Plater. Now I believe Alberts wife died in 1900 so am not looking for her. I have found ALBERT as a 4 year old in 1881 living in 6 Latimer Street, B'ham. But I just cannot find any mention after this date.... here is the
family on the 1881..

AUGUSTOS EVANS, 45, Iron Plater. b Lancs
EMMA EVANS, wife, 42 b Manchester.
ALBERT, 4
Elizabeth,15 Warehouse girl
Emily, 17 Boot Machinist
Francis,7
Henry,10
Phoebe, 22, Boot machinist, b Manchester
Sidney, 3 months
"Themar" ? 13, Brass Polisher.

Any help will be much appreciated...
Margaret.

rache

rache Report 10 Oct 2007 16:27

hi margaret

found this for 1891 not sure if its yours

henry evans 1835 beswick lancs
emily evans 1837 manchester
pheobe evans 1861 manchester
henry evans 1870 bham
francis evans 1874 bham
ALBERT EVANS 1876 bham
alice evans 1879 bham
cecil evans 1881 bham
william evans 1883 bham

rachel

Margaret

Margaret Report 10 Oct 2007 18:22

Many thanks, Rachel,
This is certainly the correct family on the 1891, they appear to be using their 2nd names !!
Your help is much appreciated...
Margaret.