Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1891 Lancs look up please?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Rosemary

Rosemary Report 30 Mar 2006 22:39

Well, the only other things I can think of that maybe Thomas is with his father or father's family, whomever they are. He's could in hospital, or grossly mistranscribed. Sorry no one could help. Rose

*Alison*

*Alison* Report 30 Mar 2006 22:09

Hello again Rose! I have the birth cert for Thomas, and Sarah Jane Rowles is the mother, but there is no name for the father! Alison.

Rosemary

Rosemary Report 30 Mar 2006 22:04

I checked and Thomas is not with any of Margaret Entwistle's family. I am assuming you have Thomas' birth cert and shows that Sarah Jane was the mother. Rose

*Alison*

*Alison* Report 30 Mar 2006 19:57

Rose, Sorry i couldn't get back sooner, Yes Entwistle is margaret's maiden name. Alison.

Rosemary

Rosemary Report 30 Mar 2006 16:08

Any idea of what Sarah Jane's mother's maiden name? Maybe Thomas is living with them and was listed with thier last name. By the way, Margaret is the wife on the 1881 and 1871 census so Mary on the 1891 is probably just an error. Would this be the right marriage record? Name: George Rowles and Entwistle, Margaret Year of Registration: 1862 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: Salford County: Greater Manchester, Lancashire Volume: 8d Page: 53 Rose

*Alison*

*Alison* Report 30 Mar 2006 15:56

Rose, yes, thats them in 1891. Thomas would only be aged around 4 or 4 years, so he can't be too far away!! I wonder where he is?! Alison

Rosemary

Rosemary Report 30 Mar 2006 15:42

Is this the correct 1891? Florry Rowles abt 1889 Manchester Daughter Manchester Lancashire George Rowles abt 1841 Warham Head Manchester Lancashire George Rowles abt 1866 Manchester Son Manchester Lancashire James Rowles abt 1885 Manchester Son Manchester Lancashire John Rowles abt 1883 Manchester Son Manchester Lancashire Lizzie Rowles abt 1880 Manchester Daughter Manchester Lancashire Mary Rowles abt 1842 Lachford, Lancashire, England Wife Manchester Lancashire Mary Rowles abt 1873 Manchester Daughter Manchester Lancashire Nancy Rowles abt 1887 Manchester Daughter Manchester Lancashire Sarah J Rowles abt 1869 Manchester Daughter Manchester Lancashire William Rowles abt 1878 Manchester Son Manchester Lancashire Rose

jen yorkshire

jen yorkshire Report 30 Mar 2006 15:41

am i missing it , i cant find sarah jane at home in 1891? . there is one with mary as mother?

Barbara

Barbara Report 30 Mar 2006 15:35

I've got the same page as Jennifer and Rosemary....George and margaret are the grandparents Barbara

*Alison*

*Alison* Report 30 Mar 2006 15:34

Yeah thats the family! i don't know why i said joseph as the head when it's George!! sorry! Anyway.... i do have this family in 1891 living at the same address in Manchester. But in 1891 there is Sarah jane living with them who is the mother of Thomas, But he is not with them on that 1891 census, and i would really like to find him! Alison.

Rosemary

Rosemary Report 30 Mar 2006 15:31

1901 for reference George Roules abt 1844 Not Known, England Head Manchester Lancashire James Roules abt 1885 Not Known, England Son Manchester Lancashire John Roules abt 1882 Not Known, England Son Manchester Lancashire Margt Roules abt 1847 Not Known, England Wife Manchester Lancashire Mary Roules abt 1875 Not Known, England Daughter Manchester Lancashire Thomas Roules abt 1887 Not Known, England Grandson Manchester Lancashire Rose

jen yorkshire

jen yorkshire Report 30 Mar 2006 15:29

hi the 1901 has the head as george? am i looking for the right one?

*Alison*

*Alison* Report 30 Mar 2006 15:18

Hello, His grandparents are Joseph and Margaret Rowles. I have just been on the 1901 page and Thomas is down as Roules, and also he is down as being born in Derby! but on the image it does say Born in Manchester!! Also Joseph and Margaret have been mistranscribed as roules aswell!! Just checked the 1901 image, for the birth place it says 'England NK' for all the family! Alison.

Rosemary

Rosemary Report 30 Mar 2006 15:09

Can't find him on the 1901 under Roules. What are the names of grandparents and mother? Rose

*Alison*

*Alison* Report 30 Mar 2006 15:04

I think they were mistranscribed! they will be down as roules i think!! it took me ages to find him in 1901 because of this!! Alison.

Esta

Esta Report 30 Mar 2006 14:49

I can't see the 1901 entry........what are the details ?

*Alison*

*Alison* Report 30 Mar 2006 14:45

Hello, I have a Thomas Rowles, who was born in Manchester in 1887. I have him in 1901, living with his grandparents, but i'm now looking for him in 1891, so he would be aged around 3 or 4 years. He was an illigitimate child, and in 1891 i have his grandparents and his mother all living together, but no sign of Thomas, can any one help??!! Alison.