Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Thomas Steen Marriage
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
William | Report | 13 Sep 2012 13:37 |
|
Thomas Steen is showing in the 1891 Census for Wrexham Denbighshire as married to a Martha given as born in Wrexham in c 1868 and with a daughter Mary J given as born in Wrexham and five months old.RG12/4618/78/17. |
|||
|
Abby | Report | 13 Sep 2012 13:40 |
|
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
greyghost | Report | 13 Sep 2012 13:41 |
|
?? |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 13 Sep 2012 13:42 |
|
Maybe they married later ? |
|||
|
William | Report | 13 Sep 2012 14:33 |
|
Thanks,whilst I'm prepared to accept that they may have married later,this does not explain the birth as named Mary J Steen as you will find in the Oct/Nov/Dec quarter of 1890 in the Wrexham District. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 13 Sep 2012 14:49 |
|
William - if Thomas Steen acknowledged paternity of his daughter, and attended the registration of her birth, then it is perfectly feasible that she would have been registered as Steen. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 13 Sep 2012 14:58 |
|
Be flexible in your thinking.............. |
|||
|
William | Report | 13 Sep 2012 15:04 |
|
Thanks,the Steen/Martha Jones 1892 marriage could well be the one yet!I've just contacted someone on Ancestry who has a very interesting Martha Jones born in Wrexham in 1869 who is with her parents in 1881 but not afterwards. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 13 Sep 2012 15:05 |
|
A registrar will write down anything he is told. My husband has always had his father's surname - and always thought his parents were married, It wasn't until after they had both died that we found out his father had married in the 1920's, the marriage broke up and because divorce was almost impossible to get that hubby's parents just lived as man and wife. |
|||
|
William | Report | 13 Sep 2012 15:21 |
|
I have to say that nothing could come out of this search that would really surprise me!Its just that we sometimes like to have;"all things being equal"! |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 13 Sep 2012 15:49 |
|
Aye, but life's not like that William! ;-) |
|||