Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Henry Lagdon b.1880
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Barbara | Report | 31 Aug 2012 21:29 |
|
Hello All, |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 31 Aug 2012 21:54 |
|
Can you post the 1901 census details? Chances are though, if he had absconded he may have changed his name to dodge the authorities so you may never find him! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Moira | Report | 31 Aug 2012 21:58 |
|
for ref.# |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 21:58 |
|
1901 is this the right family ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 21:59 |
|
Ruled that marriage out as two Henry Lagdon |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:02 |
|
Not sure of that 1901 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:04 |
|
1891 for that family GB. |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:06 |
|
Can't be the same family as OP stated as the mother is widow. Need to see where the OP got the 1901 census, can't see it on A. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:07 |
|
Emma Langdon married Thomas Anning in 1889 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:14 |
|
Hi GB, but OP states he was with mother and her second husband in 1901 - but this one is a widow? Something not quite right. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:17 |
|
Just posting in case it is relevant |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:23 |
|
And they were on 1891 census: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:24 |
|
Agree Flip |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:35 |
|
If Anning is the right family not at the moment finding them in 1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:48 |
|
Here's the 1911. Emma is a widow. |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 22:50 |
|
Also just spotted the 1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 31 Aug 2012 23:03 |
|
The Army service records for Joseph Anning make interesting reading. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Barbara | Report | 1 Sep 2012 00:03 |
|
Hello everyone, |
|||
|
Barbara | Report | 1 Sep 2012 00:06 |
|
Sorry, me again. Forgot to say Thomas Anning died in 1902. |
|||