Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Vaux's gone missing in 1861
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Linda | Report | 15 Aug 2012 22:53 |
|
Can someone else use fresh eyes to help me find my relatives in 1861. Edward (or possibly Edwin) Vaux - born in Newington Surrey in around 1850. His father is dead by this time but I have a death for his mother in 1862 so she is still around somewhere. I can't find her - Frances Vaux born circa 1819 in Newington as Frances Bartrum - either, so it is possible they are still together and their surname has been transcribed incorrectly. I have tried every spelling I can think of and done a search using 'V' only for their surname all without success. Any information or suggestions for alternative spellings is welcome. Thanks |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 15 Aug 2012 22:57 |
|
Many pieces of 1861 are not available - most of them seem to be in the Home Counties |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 15 Aug 2012 23:02 |
|
Known problems with 1861 piece numbers: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 15 Aug 2012 23:27 |
|
1851 just for info |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 15 Aug 2012 23:40 |
|
These are the parishes that are missing. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 16 Aug 2012 06:11 |
|
Could not find brother John E Vaux, 1841, in 1861 either. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 16 Aug 2012 09:17 |
|
Thanks Reggie, GlitterBaby and Ozbird. I am OK with them in 1851 and 1841. As you say 1861 seems to be the problem. Frances, Edward/Edwin and John E all seem to have vanished without trace, all to reappear later in some form, and I am struggling to think of a reason why. As it is, Edwin is known as Edward from his marriage onwards, although why he changed his name is beyond me. His birth is registered as Edwin Bartrum Vaux. I wonder if it was common to use the mother's maiden name as a middle name? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 16 Aug 2012 09:18 |
|
That's what I thought Patchem but it seems not! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 16 Aug 2012 22:29 |
|
mo2lly, using relatives' surnames is VERY common, even today. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 16 Aug 2012 22:57 |
|
Benjamin Parry was a neighbour at No 16 Lion St in 1851. He's still there in 1861, but no Vaux family at No. 17. |
|||
|
BatMansDaughter | Report | 17 Aug 2012 07:58 |
|
Hi OzBird, |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 17 Aug 2012 11:01 |
|
Thanks Oxbird. I had tried the Benjamin Parry/Lion street route myself but with no success. I looked at the younger Frances Vaux and the links to Elizabeth and Cordelia may prove useful. |
|||
Researching: |
|||