Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Lilian Hutchison's marraige

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Choccy

Choccy Report 23 Mar 2012 21:19



Posting to clarify date of bith -


1901

MYERS, Francis A Head Married M 44 1857 Coppersmith
Bridgewater
Somersetshire VIEW
MYERS, Sarah E Wife Married F 39 1862
Catford
Kent VIEW
MYERS, Francis A Son Single M 16 1885 Coppersmith
Deptford
Kent VIEW
MYERS, Edith A Daughter F 14 1887
Gillingham
Kent VIEW
MYERS, Amelia Daughter F 12 1889
Deptford
Kent VIEW
MYERS, Lily Daughter F 10 1891
Deptford
Kent VIEW
MYERS, Albert Son M 8 1893
Deptford
Kent VIEW
>>>>>MYERS, Ernest Son M 6 1895
Deptford
Kent VIEW
MYERS, Caroline Daughter F 4 1897
Deptford
Kent VIEW
MYERS, Edgar Son M 2 1899
Deptford
Kent VIEW
GREEN, Sarah Caroline Mother-In-Law F 80 1821
Hammersmith VIEW

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Piece:
524 Folio:
40 Page:
10 Registration District:
Greenwich

Civil Parish:
St Paul Deptford Municipal Borough:
Address:
149, Childers Street, St Paul Deptford County:
London

Mike *

Mike * Report 23 Mar 2012 21:02

Ah yes,
Entry number 415 and entry 419.

So 2nd one cancelled.

Janet Linda

Janet Linda Report 23 Mar 2012 20:53

Thank you for your help.

Kay????

Kay???? Report 23 Mar 2012 20:32

If you click to the previous page the entry is there


,,,,,the second entry has been a mistake and should imagine a vicar ,verger or clerk has not turned a book page from which he was entering the details into the parish register.............and therefore made two entires the second being cancelled..

Human cleric error....

maybe it was late at night after a little tiple of communtion vino..... :-D :-D :-D,

Janet Linda

Janet Linda Report 23 Mar 2012 20:16

My cousin has his DOB as 1900.

Choccy

Choccy Report 23 Mar 2012 19:51



1911

MYERS, Ernest George Single 16 1895 Deptford London VIEW

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RG number:
RG14 Piece:
5621 Reference:
RG14PN5621 RD90 SD4 ED34 SN9999

Registration District:
Portsmouth Sub District:
Portsmouth and Mid Southsea Enumeration District:
34 Parish:


Address:
Institution: Fisgard
Military details: Boy Artificers 416

County:
Hampshire

Mike *

Mike * Report 23 Mar 2012 19:35

Going by his age on marr cert, this would be his birth

Births Dec 1894 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Myers Ernest George - Greenwich 1d 1050




Am wondering if this is him also


Marriages Mar 1913 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glover Louisa S - Myers - Dartford 2a 1005
Myers Ernest G - Glover - Dartford 2a 1005

Dea

Dea Report 23 Mar 2012 19:19

Jonesey - I think that it would automatically have been entered in the index because the marriage took place.

If it was bigamous, this may have been discovered much later.

Dea x

Gwyn in Kent

Gwyn in Kent Report 23 Mar 2012 19:03

I can't decipher the groom's occupation...
Was he in the Army?

If he married without the permission of his CO, or whichever senior officer needed to grant this, I believe the Army didn't recognise the marriage....?

The couple may have arranged another ceremony or may have considered themselves married at this one in church.

Gwyn

Mike *

Mike * Report 23 Mar 2012 18:38

Could it have been a duplicate entry?
.
A bit like when you write a cheque and then cancel it because of some mistake, then write another.



EDIT :
That was a good guess ! !

Janet Linda

Janet Linda Report 23 Mar 2012 18:28

Its a bit strange. They both appear in family photo's.

Jonesey

Jonesey Report 23 Mar 2012 18:19

Dea, I was a bit slow there. The bigamy theory might be correct I suppose but the fact that it made it on to the index and remains there is curious in that case.

In my tree one of my great aunts was duped into a bigamous marriage but my understanding is that the record of the "Marriage" was subsequently expunged.

I see that Lilian died as a Myers:

Deaths Dec 1930 (>99%)
Myers Lilian B 31 Medway 2a 904

Janet Linda

Janet Linda Report 23 Mar 2012 18:18

Lilian passed away when she was 30, I have family photo's of the couple. Her neice is still alive, but she is 89, not something I can bring up in conversation over the phone.

Dea

Dea Report 23 Mar 2012 18:14

It has 'cancelled' written all through it Jonesey ??

Dea x

Dea

Dea Report 23 Mar 2012 18:13

I have absolutely no idea !!!

It is very interesting though!

Perhaps it was later found to be bigamous ???

That is all I can think of I am afraid - perhaps someone else can come up with something.

Dea x

Mike *

Mike * Report 23 Mar 2012 18:13


Appears in the index

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marriages Sep 1922 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hutchinson Lilian B - Myers -Medway 2a 1913
Myers Ernest G - Hutchinson - Medway 2a 1913

Janet Linda

Janet Linda Report 23 Mar 2012 18:08

Why would this happen
http://cityark.medway.gov.uk/query/results/?Mode=ShowImg&Img=/cityark/Scans/Ecclesiastical_Rochester_Archdeaconry_Area_Parishes/P153F_GILLINGHAM_ST_BARNABAS_1885_1917/03_Additional_deposits/01_Incumbent/01_Service_of_the_church/01D_Marriage_registers_1892_to_1969/P135F_01D_02.html/00000119.jpg

Can any one help please.