Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Census search please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Solar | Report | 10 Mar 2012 10:45 |
|
Morning all, (sorry I've had to repost as previous msg kept erroring) |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:01 |
|
Just to confirm he is right about his birthplace! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:03 |
|
Hi, yes that's the same birth record I have found but havent ordered actual certificate as yet. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:04 |
|
? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:09 |
|
1851 England Census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:11 |
|
Hi |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:16 |
|
'Barbay Cant' is a boarder I think. George is a brewer. He is widowed 1861. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:23 |
|
By the way, looking at image 1861 George is 51 not 61. So the `1851 married to Isabella must be him - his occupation is the same in any case! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:29 |
|
Ah, thats great Jan. Many thanks for all your time and help |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:38 |
|
That's OK - a bit tricky but those are the most satisfying! Have sent name corrections to Ancestry. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 10 Mar 2012 11:55 |
|
Definitely and thaks for sorting name corrections. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 12:01 |
|
They are there but Ann's age is a bit skewed! George is spot on though, 11 in 1851. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 10 Mar 2012 12:04 |
|
Ann is actually 11 in 1861 not 16. I think the transcriber had been at the bottle! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 10 Mar 2012 12:05 |
|
oooppps...oh yeah, I missed George out!. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 10 Mar 2012 12:36 |
|
Possible? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 10 Mar 2012 15:56 |
|
Hi, thankyou that is the record I found earlier this morning also. |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 10 Mar 2012 20:52 |
|
A look up of Matthew in the local index http://www.northeastbmd.org.uk/ |
|||
|
Solar | Report | 11 Mar 2012 11:35 |
|
Hi, that's great. Many thanks for the info. :-) |
|||