Find Ancestors

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Page 1 + 1 of 2

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: July 2004 Posts: 5,047 Send Message	Eringobragh1916	Report	7 Mar 2012 12:35
Member Since: July 2004 Posts: 5,047 Send Message	Misty....Can you check the actual image for 1881 I dont have access... I can tell you that a Mrs Jane Downey was listed in 1891 Trade Directory for that address....so possibly the 1881 (Family Search census is wrong..) How can Jane be down as Widow (1871)...? Edward didnt die until 1874...
Member Since: December 2003 Posts: 1,114 Send Message	Mistycat	Report	7 Mar 2012 12:42
	Sorry my mistake....she isn't a widow in 1871!! The original image for 1881 looks like Jane to me.... Misty x

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.