| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 20:59 |
|
Hi,
Have tried in vain to find a marriage for George Bailey (b 1816 Manchester -father was Robert Bailey) & Eliza??? . 1st child born 1841 so it could be about a year before - common occurence Many thanks
|
|
Mike *
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 21:15 |
|
Do you know if they married in Manchester area?
Where were they living on 1841 census?
Who was first child and where born ?
|
|
AnnCardiff
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 21:15 |
|
birth: Collegiate, Manchester, Lancashire, England residence: Manchester, Lancashire, England parents: George Bayley, Isabella record title: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975 name: George Bayley gender: Male baptism/christening date: 09 Jun 1816 baptism/christening place: Collegiate, Manchester, Lancashire, England birthplace: Collegiate, Manchester,Lancashire, England father's name: George Bayley mother's name: Isabella indexing project (batch) number: C01321-4 system origin: England-EASy source film number:
|
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 21:35 |
|
Thanks Ann o fGG
This seems very likely despite the difference in spelling of bailey. Their first child Isabella was born June 1841.
My previous info may be incorrect. Recurrent names are sometimes a clue and there are no Elizas at all in this branch of my tree. Isabella occurs 3 times in the Bailey line. Jacqui
|
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 21:50 |
|
Hi Ann Now I'm getting myself all muxed ip.
George jnr was born 1816 and his parents were George and Isabella. That bit's fine.
George jnr married someone called Eliza, but that's the marriage I can't find. It's THEIR child who was Isabella b 1841 obviously called after his mother. Does that make sense ? Jacqui
|
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 21:52 |
|
thanks EVEIE, . That could be the one. Wonder when the spelling changed. Jacqui
|
|
Mike *
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 21:53 |
|
Daughter's birth ?????
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Births Jun 1841 Bailey Isabella - Salford 20 746
|
|
Mike *
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 21:56 |
|
Was George married previously ??
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marriages Mar 1838 Bailey George Marsden Liverpool 20 133 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Bate Mary Liverpool 20 133 Evans Mary Liverpool 20 133 Jones Ann Liverpool 20 133 Jones William Liverpool 20 133 Laycock Henry William Liverpool 20 133 Manners Jane Liverpool 20 133
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 22:01 |
|
This is the birth?
Births Jun 1841 Bailey Isabella Salford 20 746
Is this the family in 1851 in Manchester?
Name: George Bailey Age: 35 Estimated birth year: abt 1816 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Eliza Bailey > Father's name: Robert Bailey Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Manchester Town: Manchester County/Island: Lancashire Registration district: Manchester
George Bailey 35 - spindle maker Eliza Bailey 35 Martha Bailey 13 Isabela Bailey 11 Joseph Bailey 1 Bessy Bailey 1/12 Robert Bailey 56
You really need Isabella's birth certificate to get her mother's full name.
Given the possibility of two marriages for George, you may need a later child's birth certificate as well!
The big space between the older and younger children does suggest a second marriage. Martha Bailey might be a child the second wife brought to the marriage, recorded as Bailey in the census?
If that's the right family ...
|
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 22:21 |
|
thanks everyone. Janey, That's the record I've been using. but in that george's father is recorded as Robert. The earlier findings from Ann GG are also very likely, but parentas are different. like you I'm thinking 2 marriages or he took on eliza's children from previous relationship, given the big gap. Bigamy sounds good - not got any of that yet!!!! LOL
|
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 22:36 |
|
Much less interesting but George's first wife may have died after Isabella. Marries Eliza and has betsy and joseph. I'll send for certificates to make sure. thanks for all your help.
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
4 Jan 2011 23:56 |
|
sorry to upset the applecart but George's wife in 1846 was not Eliza
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1846 Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference BAYLEY George M WOOLAM Ann M Manchester, St. John Manchester STJ/7/124
the 1838 Liverpool one was to Mary Bate
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1838 Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference BAILEY George M BATE Mary Liverpool, St. David Liverpool 2099LP/1/62
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2011 00:14 |
|
If Eliza was a second marriage this one could fit given the age of the younger children
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1849 Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference BAILEY George TUTE Eliza Manchester Cathedral (formerly Manchester Collegiate Church) Manchester CATH/73/2
have you found the family in 1841 (don't forget ages of adults were rounded) and there seems to have been at least one child born 1837/38 - Marth
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2011 01:44 |
|
"Much less interesting but George's first wife may have died after Isabella. Marries Eliza and has betsy and joseph."
That was the scenario I had in mind. ;)
"That's the record I've been using. " (the 1851 census I posted)
But you said Isabella 1841 was their first child, and there's older daughter Martha in 1851!
You do need to be sure that the Isabella birth in 1841 is really your Isabella.
LancsAnn -- I hunted around in the 1841 census for all of 'em to no avail.
If Martha and/or Isabella belonged to a second wife of George Bailey, it would mean looking at a gazillion records to find a Martha or Isabella with a mother Eliza who fit, since relationships can't be used for searching the 1841 ...
EVEIE -- I had gone past thinking to myself and searched at pilot.familysearch for an Isabella Marsden connection ... to no avail. ;)
starburst, who in this crowd is actually your most recent ancestor (child of George?), and what info do you have about that person, e.g. from birth / marriage certificates?
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2011 14:00 |
|
Janey - I think the Marsden bit is now irrelevant as I think we have proved that neither George Marsden Bailey marriage was the right one. I agree that the only way to go is to get Isabella's birth cert as her mother's name could be anything if Eliza was a second wife married after Isabella was born (poss the one in 1849 above). George could also have been married before 1837 as there could also be a child older than Martha who has already left home in 1851 to go into service so parish records would be needed.
Love your photo on GR facebook Janey - sure you did not borrow it from FBG????
edit It could be difficult to find the right Isabella birth as the 1841 one in Salford would only make her 9yrs old not 11 in 1851
this one in Chorlton is perhaps a little close but she may not even have been registered Births Mar 1838 (>99%) Bayley Isabella Chorlton 20 130
|
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2011 20:35 |
|
Hi everyone, Isabella Bailey 1841 is GG grandmother. She married William Henry Whitney in Manchester 1862. i have certified evidence from their daughter Martha Ann Whitney to date. Sorry my mistake Janey. Martha Bailey was 1838, Isabella 1841. Family are mainly from manchester and later salford - and still are. There is no Liverpool connection at all and as 1851 Census shows, bailey is spelt ai rather than ay. I think Lancashire ann is right to discount the Marsden bit. The name means nothing at all to anyone and doesn't fit any info.
until my certs arrive i assume George had Martha and Isabella with wife 1 and Bessie and Joseph with wife 2. GRO will make a fortune from me. Thank you all so much for your efforts. watch this space.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2011 22:11 |
|
So that being the right household in 1851, I'd say that Isabella's age just wasn't reported accurately. This is her in 1871, consistent with an 1841 birth:
Name: Isabella Whitney Age: 29 Estimated birth year: abt 1842 Relation: Wife Spouse's name: Wm H Whitney Where born: Manchester
Civil Parish: St Jude County/Island: Lancashire Registration district: Manchester
Wm H Whitney 30 Isabella Whitney 29 W H Whitney 1 Month
So there's a good chance the 1841 birth is her. *If* George was her father.
LancsAnn -- I've posted the tale of my avatar pic, "Ada the Actress", on the GR FB wall: http://www.facebook.com/genesreunited ;)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2011 22:33 |
|
LancsAnn posted this marriage:
Marriages Dec 1849 Bailey George Manchester 20 451 Tute Eliza Manchester 20 451
Births Dec 1837 ? Tute Martha Manchester 20 250
1841
Name: Eliza Tute Age: 20 Estimated birth year: abt 1821 Gender: Female Where born: Leicestershire, England Occupation: anybody? Civil Parish: Manchester County/Island: Leicestershire [Ah, stupid Ancestry tricks] Salford Union Workhouse
And what catches my eye as I scan the image, on the facing page?
Well, Ancestry has obviously mistranscribed it, so I'll have to see what might look likely ... Ha!
Name: Gabella Stote -- it says Isabella Tute !! Age: 1 MO Estimated birth year: abt 1841 Where born: Leicestershire, England Civil Parish: Manchester Hundred: Manchester County/Island: Leicestershire
There's no birth registration for that name ... and I don't see Martha Tute in 1841.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
5 Jan 2011 22:52 |
|
Just in case it's the right trail:
Name: Eliza Tute Gender: Female Baptism/Christening Date: 18 Oct 1816 Baptism/Christening Place: Manchester, Lancashire, England Father's Name: Robert Tute Mother's Name: Martha Tute Indexing Project (Batch) Number: C03584-2 System Origin: England-EASy Source Film Number: 438167 Reference Number: p. 282, no. 2256 Collection: Ireland, Civil Registration Indexes, 1845-1958
But the Martha Tute birth would be wrong:
Name: Martha Tute Gender: Female Baptism/Christening Date: 26 Nov 1837 Baptism/Christening Place: Collegiate, Manchester, Lancashire, England Birthplace: Manchester, Lancaster, England > Father's Name: John Tute > Mother's Name: Eliza Tute Indexing Project (Batch) Number: C02292-7 System Origin: England-EASy Source Film Number: 1545611 Reference Number: item 2 p 851 Collection: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
Although ... that John Tute might be a fiction or a muddle, because there are also these births:
Name: Mary Ann Hurst Gender: Female Baptism/Christening Date: 08 Mar 1835 Baptism/Christening Place: CATHEDRAL, MANCHESTER, LANCASHIRE, ENGLAND > Father's Name: John Hurst > Mother's Name: Eliza Tute Indexing Project (Batch) Number: C09789-6 System Origin: England-ODM Source Film Number: 438172 Reference Number: Collection: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
Either Tute or Hurst could be a misreading ... Mother's surname just wasn't recorded for baptisms of children of married couples at the time.
Name: Emma Tute Gender: Female Baptism/Christening Date: 26 Apr 1846 Baptism/Christening Place: Christ Church, Manchester, Lancashire, England > Father's Name: > Mother's Name: Eliza Tute Indexing Project (Batch) Number: I04836-7 System Origin: England-EASy Source Film Number: 93969 Reference Number: 116 Collection: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
and possibly a death to match:
Deaths Jun 1846 Tute Emma Manchester 20 468
Eliza Tute's mother was Martha and she had a brother Joseph born 1832, so the names line up.
|
|
jimarg45
|
Report
|
6 Jan 2011 21:30 |
|
janey , You're a star. You just keep going. Thank you very much.
I'll go with the possible infant death as well. There are so many of them in this particular branch.
|