Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
James Buckley/Emily Read
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
David | Report | 7 Nov 2010 23:19 |
Im trying to find information on partners, and children etc, for the following children born to James Buckley & Emily Read. |
|||
|
tempest | Report | 7 Nov 2010 23:22 |
1911 census - household transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 7 Nov 2010 23:30 |
Name: Frederick Albert Buckley |
|||
|
tempest | Report | 7 Nov 2010 23:49 |
just to add to the 1911 Kucinta found for James b 1855, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 8 Nov 2010 00:06 |
There is a tree which states Emma Elizabeth is the mother's name... 9 children listed including 2 James's and William's |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 8 Nov 2010 00:08 |
Hmmmm, |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 8 Nov 2010 00:12 |
James George Buckley 7 May 1876 James George Buckley, |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 8 Nov 2010 00:25 |
I'm not too sure the Stepney and Limehouse one's are her. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 8 Nov 2010 00:26 |
Interesting..... son James George & Anges's children? |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 8 Nov 2010 00:33 |
Frederick won't be there as they only goto 1906 :( |
|||
|
Cynthia | Report | 6 Jan 2011 14:08 |
I gather that you had looked at this post earlier David? If you say the amount of information has reduced, then this probably means that it has been deleted by the helper who posted it. Some helpers will delete their work if it is not acknowledged within a reasonable period of time. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
David | Report | 8 Jan 2011 23:48 |
Cynthia, |
|||
|
Cynthia | Report | 9 Jan 2011 07:17 |
Difficult to say David to be honest. Your message will have popped up in the My Threads box of those who have already helped you and whose reply is still here, but it may be that there is nothing more they can find. Those who posted the other info and deleted, won't necessary see this thread unless they are browsing the boards. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
David | Report | 9 Jan 2011 23:51 |
Cynthia, |
|||
|
Cynthia | Report | 10 Jan 2011 08:00 |
You have nudged it by adding your comment David, as have I by adding this! Sometimes you will just see 'n' on a thread as that is all it takes to take it back to the top. Regards. Cynthia |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
David | Report | 11 Jan 2011 00:39 |
Cynthia, |