| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Ali79
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 18:36 |
|
Thank you for that explanation, This may explain why they can't be found!!!
I think it may be right that Emma got confused with the father on her cert as they both have Reuben in.
Thank you all it's been most helpful.
Alison Blake
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 15:29 |
|
Thank you NL.
And back then finding half a crown for a piece of paper instead of on food.clothing or housing would have been a waste of money to a lot of people,plus of course they may not have had the money in the first place..
|
|
CherryBlossom
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 15:21 |
|
You're right Fanny.
The History of Birth Certificates Births weren't always registered. That only first became necessary on July 1st 1837, when it was decreed that every subsequent birth, marriage and death in England or Wales had to be registered by the state. With births, the event would be registered in the district where the child was born, and at the end of each quarter, the registrar would send a copy of all the entries to the Registrar General. That means there should be two entries - one local, one national - for every birth since 1837. However, registering all three events didn't become compulsory until 1875. When it was introduced, the cost of a copy certificate was two shillings and sixpence (30p), one shilling (5p) of which went to the registrar and the fee stayed the same until 1952.
This means that tracing births back to 1875 is relatively straightforward. Between 1837-1875 it might prove a bit harder, as some didn't register, or even gave false names for a number of reasons - to hide the true age of a child so it could be sent out to work, or, after 1853, because parents wanted to avoid the compulsory vaccination of children at three months old, which was introduced that year. Until 1875 there was no penalty for parents who didn't register a birth, and then a £2 fine was introduced.
There may very well be a local registration for John and Emma but perhaps the quarterly copy didn't get sent off to the GRO or was lost en route. Perhaps Islington or St Pancras register office might have something.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 15:17 |
|
Not very good at explaining this but. Until 1875 (I think)it was not the law that you HAD to reg your child at the reg office.
A friends gran did not reg her 2 daughters births until 1938 when they asked for their certs to get a passport ! She then had to admit they werent reg when born 20 and 22 yrs before as she "hadnt got round to it" !
|
|
Ali79
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 14:36 |
|
Thank you everyone for the information, I was starting to think I may have missed something but now others can't find a birth for either John or Emma, poss Jane, I know I am not mad!!.
Can I ask, if the births are not registered, why was this? in genral?
Many thanks again for looking I will keep searching for the answer, my father in laws side certainly is tricky!!!
Alison Blake
|
|
Astra
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:47 |
|
One for the pot! The ages and places of birth are right for this to be Isaac and Sarah
Alfred Woodlen Age: 7 Estimated birth year: abt 1864 Relation: Son Father's Name: Georgie Woodlen Mother's Name: Sarah Woodlen Gender: Male Where born: Islington Civil parish: Islington St John Ecclesiastical parish: St John County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Islington Household Members: Name Age Georgie Woodlen 34 >>>>Gardener Sarah Woodlen 36 Alfred Woodlen 7
|
|
CherryBlossom
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:45 |
|
1841 England Census Name: Isaac Woodlin Age: 6 Estimated birth year: abt 1835 Gender: Male Civil parish: St Mary Magdalen Bermondsey Hundred: Brixton (Eastern Division) County/Island: Surrey Country: England Registration district: St Mary Magdalen Bermondsey Sub-registration district: St James Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Benjamen Woodlin 28 ....gardener Vizey Woodlin 27 Isaac Woodlin 6 John Woodlin 9 MO
None of them born in County.
Possible other children for Isaac and Sarah Births Dec 1860 WOODLIN Isaac Islington 1b 293
Deaths Dec 1860 Woodlin Isaac Islington 1b 185
Births Dec 1861 WOODLIN Emily Ni[sz][ce]ay Islington 1b 189 (???Emily Vizey)
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:43 |
|
Name: Isaac Woodlin Age: Full Age Estimated birth year: abt 1856 Spouse Name: Sarah Masters Record Type: Marriage Marriage Date: 05 Apr 1856 Parish: St Paul, Canonbury County: Middlesex Borough: Islington Father Name: Benjamin Woodlin Spouse Father Name: Reuben Masters
So Isaac and Sarah were married...
|
|
Julie
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:38 |
|
I can't see a birth for John or Emma
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:23 |
|
I do not see a birth anywhere in the timescale or place (ish)For an Emma Jane Woodlin at the moment.
Births for almost everyone else,but not her.
Maybe she was not registered at birth?
|
|
CherryBlossom
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:12 |
|
Looking at the originals of the marriage certificates for Alfred Reuben Woodlin - it gives his father as Isaac Reuben Woodlin - gardener, on his first marriage, Isaac Woodlin (deceased), gardener on his second marriage and Isaac Woodlin (deceased), waiter (!!!) on his third marriage
Could Emma have become confused when she gave her father's name to the registrar and said Alfred Reuben instead of Isaac Reuben.
The Isaac on the 1881 census is a gardener and Sarah gives 'Alfred Reuben's' occupation as a gardener deceased on her marriage certificate. Isaac died in 1888.
Alfred Reuben's occupation on his marriage certificates is plumber/gas fitter for the first two marriages and carpenter for the third marriage.
My guess is that Alfred Reuben is Emma's brother and not her father and that Isaac and Sarah are her parents.
|
|
rootgatherer
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:11 |
|
Here is her nieces with their parents in 1891
Name: John Woodlin Age: 37 Estimated birth year: abt 1854 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Sarah Woodlin Gender: Male Where born: Islington, London, England Civil parish: Islington Ecclesiastical parish: St Peter Town: London County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Islington Sub-registration district: Upper Holloway ED, institution, or vessel: 1 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age John Woodlin 37 Sarah Woodlin 26 Annie Woodlin 7 Sarah Woodlin 5 Nelley Woodlin 3 Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 141; Folio 14; Page 26; GSU roll: 6095251
|
|
Julie
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:07 |
|
Marriages Jun 1883 (>99%) COX Mary Ann Islington 1b 338 JAMES Sarah Islington 1b 338 WHITE William Henry J Islington 1b 338 >>>>>Woodlin Alfred Reuben Islington 1b 338
|
|
TootyFruity
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:05 |
|
For reference
BLAKE, Edward James Head Married M 42 1869 House Painter Islington London BLAKE, Emma Jane Wife Married 21 years F 39 1872 Islington London BLAKE, Edward Woodlin Son Single M 21 1890 House Painter Islington London BLAKE, Robert Son Single M 19 1892 Carman Contractor Islington London BLAKE, Martha Daughter Single F 16 1895 Islington London BLAKE, Emma Jane Daughter F 9 1902 Islington London BLAKE, William Richard Son M 2 1909 Islington London RG number:RG14 Piece:790 Reference:RG14PN790 RG78PN27 RD10 SD1 ED15 SN330 Registration District:Islington Sub District:Tufnell Enumeration District:15 Parish:Islington Address:3 Eaton Grove Holloway N
Is this your family?
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 13:01 |
|
1901..again for ref.
BLAKE JR, Edward J Head Married M 29 1872 Coal Carman Islington London BLAKE, Emma J Wife Married F 28 1873 Islington London BLAKE, Edward J Son M 10 1891 Islington London BLAKE, Robert Son M 7 1894 Islington London BLAKE, Martha Daughter F 6 1895 Islington London WOODLIN, Ann Niece Single F 17 1884 Laundress Highgate London WOODLIN, Sarher Niece Single F 15 1886 Laundress Highgate London Registration District: Islington Sub District: Upper Holloway Enumeration District: 17 Ecclesiastical Parish: All Saints Civil Parish: Islington Municipal Borough: Address: 75, Rupert Road, Islington County: London
1881
WOODLIN, Isaac Head Married M 44 1837 Grdnr (N D) Ongar Essex WOODLIN, Sarah Wife Married F 47 1834 Mrylbne Middlesex WOODLIN, John Son Single M 18 1863 Grainer St Pancras Middlesex WOODLIN, Jane Daughter Single F 8 1873 Schr St Pancras Middlesex Registration District: Islington Sub District: Islington East Enumeration District: Ecclesiastical Parish: Civil Parish: Islington Municipal Borough: Address: 10, Dillon Pl, Islington County: Middlesex
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 12:54 |
|
1891 for ref
BLAKE, Edward J Head Married M 20 1871 House Painter London BLAKE, Jane Wife Married F 19 1872 Holloway London BLAKE, Edward J Son M 1 1890 Holloway London Registration District: Islington Sub District: Upper Holloway Enumeration District: Ecclesiastical Parish: St Johns Civil Parish: Islington Municipal Borough: Address: 68, Hampden Road, Islington, London County: London
Name: Edward James Blake Age: 20 Estimated birth year: abt 1871 Spouse Name: Emma Jane Woodlin Spouse Age: 19 Record Type: Marriage Marriage Date: 09 Feb 1891 Parish: St Peter, Highgate Hill County: London Borough: Islington Father Name: Edward James Blake Spouse Father Name: Alfred Renben Woodlin
|
|
Ali79
|
Report
|
6 Oct 2010 12:32 |
|
Hi, I am trying to find the birth for Emma Jane Woodlin, born 1871/2.
She had a child in 1889, Edward James Blake and married Edward James Blake Snr in 1891, when she was 19. On her Marriage Cert it has 'father' Alfred Reuben Woodlin'. 'Deceased'
I have searched Alfred and saw he was married 3 times but his date of birth, which matches up with birth records and marriage records would of made him 7/8 when Emma was born, so Alfred can't be her father (she also said he was deceased in 1891 but seemed alive in 1900 on his third marriage)
I have found a Jane Woodlin, in the 1881 Census living with Isaac and Sarah Woodlin, and John woodlin 18, Isaac and Sarah were Alfreds parents (I know Isaac was for sure)
I assume, John, Alfred and Emma were siblings??
I cannot find Alfred born in Islington in any of the census' I have found on Ancestry.co.uk.
Would anyone be able to give me a website address or any info?
I would be very greatful, if I do not reply straight away I am out for the afternoon.
Many Thanks, Alison Blake
|