| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:16 |
|
Hi I’m really stuck with this couple. I want to order a birth cert for the wife and a death cert for the husband but I can’t find either of them on freebmd.
Wife is Laura Allchin, found her christening on IGI Apr 1852, Milton next Sittingbourne, Kent but unable to find GRO index for birth. (Also have her death cert - Feb 1928, Dartford). Husband is Charles William Culmer, have his birth cert (Sep 1850, Dartford) and their marriage cert (March 1872, Bermondsey) but can find no record of his death!! He is on 1891 census with wife and family in Dartford, but not 1901 or 1911.
I know their eldest son emigrated to US with his family in 1914 (thanks to help from lovely people on Genes a few months ago) but haven’t found any trace of him going with them.
I’ve tried various different spellings for both but still no luck. Would really appreciate any suggestions please as I don’t know where to look next.
Thank you, Jane
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:30 |
|
Hi Jane,
I don't see a birth registration for Laura, but remember that strick registration was really enforced until 1875.... although registration was started in 1837 it was the parishes responsability to track down births and very often many were not.
Dee x
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:31 |
|
Laura is still stating she is married in 1901...... so where was hubby?
Dee x
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:37 |
|
Hi Dee
Thanks, didn't know about 1875. Just want to trace her family back and thought birth cert would be useful. Don't know where hubby was in 1901. Her death cert stated widow. But I have birth cert for daughter born 1893 and no father listed, but when daughter married her surname had changed from Culmer!! So don't know where he went. Really frustrating!
Thanks Jane
|
|
PricklyHolly
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:38 |
|
It states Laura is a widow on the 1911.
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:39 |
|
Hi Greensleeves
I saw that one and may have to send for it, but age isn't quite right. I suppose that probably wasn't unusual though.
Thanks Jane
|
|
Abby
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:40 |
|
Name: Laura Allchin Gender: Female Baptism/Christening Date: 18 Apr 1852 Baptism/Christening Place: Parish Church of Milton-next-Sittingbourne, Milton-next-Sittingbourne, Kent, England Birth Date: Birthplace: Death Date: Name Note: Race: Father's Name: George Allchin Father's Birthplace: Father's Age: Mother's Name: Letitia Allchin Mother's Birthplace: Mother's Age: Indexing Project (Batch) Number: I01262-2 System Origin: England-EASy Source Film Number: 1835502 Reference Number: item 1 Collection: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
|
|
Artbeat
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:46 |
|
Think the death for charles that greensleeves found is probably this one?????.
1901
Name: Charles Culmer Age: 48 Estimated birth year: abt 1853 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Emma Gender: Male Where born: Monkton, Kent, England Civil parish: Garlinge Ecclesiastical parish: Westbrook County/Island: Kent Country: England Street Address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View image Registration district: Thanet Sub-registration district: Margate ED, institution, or vessel: 2 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 19 Household Members: Name Age Charles Culmer 48 Emma Culmer 46 George Culmer 16 Frederick Culmer 12 Edith Culmer 9 Edward Culmer 7 Arthur Culmer 4 Georgina Culmer 2
richard
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:49 |
|
Hi Susan and safc
Can't understand why I can't find his death listed as his wife states she is a widow, unless the death found by Greensleeves is him and the age is wrong.
That looks like the christening record I found. Had hoped to get birth cert and check her mother's maiden name, think it was Letitia Straitfield but haven't had much luck with that branch of the tree and thought cert would help.
Thank Jane
|
|
Abby
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:58 |
|
Marriages Dec 1850 (>99%) Allchin George Medway 5 558 Straitfield Leititia Medway 5 558 Straitfield Letitia Medway 5 558 Straitfield Loetitia Medway 5 558
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 13:59 |
|
Hi Richard
I think you're right which means it isn't my Charles!
Thanks Jane
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 14:05 |
|
Hi safc
Think I've found George and Letitia on 1851 census., but later censuses have different names for the daughters! Not had much luck finding Letitia Straitfield's family on 1841 census though.
Thanks Jane
|
|
Abby
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 14:11 |
|
Name: Sarah Latitia Alchin Gender: Female Baptism/Christening Date: 31 Dec 1854 Baptism/Christening Place: Milton-next-Sittingbourne, Kent, England Birth Date: Birthplace: Death Date: Name Note: Race: Father's Name: George Alchin Father's Birthplace: Father's Age: Mother's Name: Latitia Mother's Birthplace: Mother's Age: Indexing Project (Batch) Number: I01321-9 System Origin: England-EASy Source Film Number: 1473711 Reference Number: 214 Collection: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
|
|
Abby
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 14:13 |
|
Name: Fanny Allchin Gender: Female Baptism/Christening Date: 28 Aug 1853 Baptism/Christening Place: Parish Church of Milton-next-Sittingbourne, Milton-next-Sittingbourne, Kent, England Birth Date: Birthplace: Death Date: Name Note: Race: Father's Name: George Allchin Father's Birthplace: Father's Age: Mother's Name: Letitia Allchin Mother's Birthplace: Mother's Age: Indexing Project (Batch) Number: I01262-2 System Origin: England-EASy Source Film Number: 1835502 Reference Number: item 1 p 200 Collection: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 14:18 |
|
Hi safc
Have found Sarah L Bolton and son living with George and Letitia on 1881 census. Could be same daughter, but Letita on 1861and Lauria on 1871?? suppose could have used different names or just been spelled wrong. Wish they had registered the births properly though so I could order the cert! And still don't know what happened to Laura's husband!
Thanks Jane
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
9 Jul 2010 14:32 |
|
Have to go back to work now but will check back later just in case anyone has added anything. Jane x
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2010 16:37 |
|
Thank you very much everyone who helped me last week, at least I now know that birth reg wasn’t compulsory in 1850s. Can anyone tell me whether parish records for births would contain info such as address and father’s occupation the same as a birth certificate would or is just the info found on familysearch? I’m still unable to find any trace of Charles William Culmer (b1850) after the 1891 census – he just seems to have dropped off the face of the earth! If anyone can suggest anywhere else I can look for him I would be really grateful. Thank you, Jane
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2010 18:51 |
|
Jane
Birth registration was compulsory from July 1 1837 ...... the problem was that it was the Registrar's responsibility to find out about a birth, then go to the mother and get the details to fill out the certificate.
Not easy to do!! Many many births were missed
The law was changed in mid-1874 so that the onus was put on the Mother to go and register the birth within 6 weeks ...... or be fined.
Many births still were not registered PLUS some mothers who missed the deadline registered their baby with a later birth date.
Last week, one lady on GR who had been searching for a registration for a relative posted that she had eventually found it in 1954. He had been born in 1899! No change in birth date on that one fortunately!!
Secondly, the baptism record should show the father's name, and may show his occupation, and the address at which they were living.
Thirdly, have you considered the possibility that Charles William may have left the family, and then re-married or took up with another woman???
If this happened, divorce was usually not obtained ......... it was very expensive and extremely difficult
BUT the woman may well describe herself to everyone as a Widow .....perhaps telling them that husand had died in another town while on a trip. Much more respectable to be a Widow, than a deserted wife.
Remember that the much of the information given on a death certificate is only that which is known to the informant ................ if the informant was told that xxxxx was a widow, then that is what would be entered.
The only facts that you can depend on on a death certificate are :- date, place and cause of death; name and address of doctor; and , name, address and relationship of informant.
Everything else is hearsay!
sylvia
|
|
JanieH
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2010 19:11 |
|
Hi Sylvia Thanks for all that information. I will have to plan a visit to Kent soon to look for the baptism records. It seems that Laura had a number of sisters and I can't find GRO references for any of them.
I'm tearing my hair out with Charles William Culmer. I did wonder if he had remarried but can't find any record of one. I know that when his? youngest daughter married she had a different maiden name which meant I had a lot of trouble finding it!
I just can't find any record of his death unless he is still alive which would make him 160!!
Thanks again, Jane
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2010 19:21 |
|
he may not have remarried
... that would be bigamy ......... although some husbands who deserted their first wife did later marry bigamously
he could also have changed his name.
There is a Charles Culmer who was born in 1852/3 in Kent ................. so you have to be careful of that one.
sylvia
|