Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1851/52 baptism
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Marian | Report | 8 Jul 2010 14:49 |
|
I am trying to find which church in Leeds the baptism of Charles Bowman may have taken place. I think he was probably illegitimate. I cannot find him on the 1861 census and I think this could be because he was on the part of the 1861 census in Leeds that is missing. As I don't know the Leeds area which has the missing 1861 census I don't know which church would be the nearest. His birth is not registered on freebmd so I am hoping he was baptised. Any suggestions as to the name of the nearest church is much appreciated. Hope the above makes sense. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 14:53 |
|
nearest church to where? Leeds is a big place |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marian | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:07 |
|
Sorry, I don't know. Near the part of Leeds which has the missing census, which I think might be the west side. Is my request unrealistic? |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:10 |
|
Which census have you found him on? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:12 |
|
To me it is unrealistic not that I have ever been to Leeds as its a city |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:12 |
|
Don't suppose this could be him? It's not Leeds. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mistycat | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:13 |
|
There is this birth in Leeds ( from Ansestry ) |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:18 |
|
or one of these 2 that matches with the baptism |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marian | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:19 |
|
Thanks everyone. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:22 |
|
Marian if you gave us some more details of which charles Bowman you are looking for maybe someone could help |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:39 |
|
Is this the one? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marian | Report | 8 Jul 2010 15:51 |
|
Yes Jax, this is the Charles birth/baptism I am looking for but without much success. He very inconveniently (for me) dies in 1886. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 16:01 |
|
so have you found him in 1881? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marian | Report | 8 Jul 2010 16:04 |
|
Yes, and it says born Leeds, he's still in West Hartlepool and dies there. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Jul 2010 16:10 |
|
I cannot see it was he married? kids? also cannot see a death for him in 1886 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 8 Jul 2010 17:36 |
|
?/ marriage |
|||
|
Stan | Report | 8 Jul 2010 19:15 |
|
This Charles Bowman and Fanny are still in Darlington in 1911, aged 80 and 77. Charles died there in 1922, aged 93, Fanny died there in 1918, aged 85. Charles was born in York according to the 1911 Census, and Fanny in Evington (Elvington?), Yorkshire, but they had only been married for 30 years in 1911, so it was quite clearly Charles' second or later marriage (as he had a son, Arthur, 35 in 1911). Your Charles cannot have been the groom in the marriage in 1880 in Darlington. |
|||
|
Stan | Report | 9 Jul 2010 09:04 |
|
I see that Charles Bowmont died Jan-Mar 1886, Hartlepool 10a 85, aged 34. Charles Bowmont is found in 1881 at 27 Stainton Street, Stranton (West Hartlepool), a railway guard aged 28 with wife Annie, son Horatio and daughter Clara. Charles Armitage Bowmont married Annie Race Apr-Jun 1876, Hartlepool 10a 177. |
|||
|
Marian | Report | 19 Aug 2010 14:38 |
|
I first raised this query quite early in July and have only noticed that my replies went over on to a second page which I have only just read (believe it or not). Thank you all for replying (sorry its late) and thank you Stan, that is worth investigating. |
|||