Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Thomas Monty
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MargaretM | Report | 15 Jul 2010 04:06 |
|
Tees Valley Indexes only show one born 1860 +/- 10 yrs. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
TheLadyInRed | Report | 14 Jul 2010 23:34 |
|
Victoria, that's really interesting and I must dig further into it. As I said, I haven't had much time to spend on research recently but you've got me fired up to have another go this weekend. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 14 Jul 2010 22:31 |
|
Yes, I'd worked out about the mistranscription.............that's why I posted the record for you |
|||
|
Vicci | Report | 14 Jul 2010 22:21 |
|
1891 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vicci | Report | 14 Jul 2010 22:19 |
|
i have submitted a name correction for the 1891 census record |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vicci | Report | 14 Jul 2010 22:17 |
|
1891 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
TheLadyInRed | Report | 14 Jul 2010 21:52 |
|
Flick, the Aymes you found in 1861 is actually Agnes mistranscribed. |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 13 Jul 2010 10:47 |
|
Well, I actually found a census record for a couple who had 9 or 10 children and all the boys had the same first name and all the girls too. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 13 Jul 2010 09:15 |
|
Any chance of some feedback on this one? |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 19 May 2010 23:05 |
|
1861 |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 19 May 2010 23:01 |
|
Did you look at the parents' marriage? |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 May 2010 22:57 |
|
And what did you find? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 19 May 2010 22:57 |
|
If the Monty family are your relations, it's much better for you to research them yourself, as other people may be less than thorough |
|||
|
TheLadyInRed | Report | 19 May 2010 22:55 |
|
Flick, yes have done so |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 May 2010 22:54 |
|
Well, it's not unheard of that people called subsequent children after one who had died. Why not contact the tree owner and ask them? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 19 May 2010 22:53 |
|
Have you tried contacting the person on Ancestry? |
|||
|
TheLadyInRed | Report | 19 May 2010 22:51 |
|
someone on Anc****y has Thomas Monty b 1853 to parents Francis John Monty and Agnes Clark. |
|||