Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Eliza Quayle born circa 1835
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 17:10 |
|
Not too fussed aboutthe ages as in 1871 it says Eliza was 34 but born in 1837 - poss mistranscribed??? |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 17:06 |
|
Not too concerned about the age as it also gives year of birth as 1837 in 1871 which would put Eliza at 44 |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 17:03 |
|
Astra |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 16:58 |
|
Hi There |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 6 Nov 2009 16:38 |
|
You could be correct Rootgatherer but as you well know the details on the census have been known to be a distant relative to the truth! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 6 Nov 2009 16:30 |
|
if Eliza was of full age (ie over 21) on her wedding certificate it means she would have been at least 27 in the 1861 census, so unless she was lying on one or the other it is possible that the one i you have found is not the right Eliza |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 6 Nov 2009 16:21 |
|
Is this a possible for 1871 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 16:02 |
|
The trail for Eliza and children seems to have disappeared until her son Richard appears again in 1891 whereby he is with his kids in Cumbria - so 1871 and 1881 are a mystery |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:57 |
|
Maybe the Isle of Man being misheard is a possibility.... |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:53 |
|
Do you have any of the family in 1871 please? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jacky | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:45 |
|
maybe the person doing the census was a bit deaf or miss herd her & thought she said ireland instead of isle of man ??? |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:43 |
|
Hi Rootgatherer |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:40 |
|
Is this the census that you have found? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:12 |
|
Hi Potty |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:09 |
|
Have you found Eliza with the child who is your gt gt grandparent on any census? |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 6 Nov 2009 15:06 |
|
What was William's occupation on the marriage cert? |
|||
|
Marina | Report | 6 Nov 2009 14:41 |
|
My great great great grandmother Eliza Quayle has brought me to a brick wall. She married a William Smith in 1854 and ages are given only as FULL (I understand this to be legally old enough to marry) |
|||