Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Please look up 1901 census.
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Stevendeg | Report | 28 Jun 2009 07:41 |
|
I am looking for Mary Allen who was born in 1850 at Caversham, Oxfordshire. I have her 1851 to 1891 as she was a single. But I am unable to find her in 1901. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Clitheroelass | Report | 28 Jun 2009 07:45 |
|
This looks like the one mentiontiond but she is married to a james |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:05 |
|
1871 England Census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:08 |
|
Hi Steven, |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:09 |
|
1861 England Census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Stevendeg | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:10 |
|
Hi Clitheroelass, many thanks for your time. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:13 |
|
Hi Steven, |
|||
|
Clitheroelass | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:14 |
|
This looks like a possible but gives a different area for birth |
|||
|
Stevendeg | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:15 |
|
Hi Susan, I don't think they were them in 1871. Because William Wakefield or Mary Allen were married in Jun 1891 from FreeBMD. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:36 |
|
Hi Steven |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:38 |
|
It looks as if Clitheroelass has found the correct Mary and William in 1901 for the marriage. |
|||
|
Stevendeg | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:45 |
|
Tracey, thanks for another 1901 of them. That's mean Mary Wakefield is not what I am looking for. :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Clitheroelass | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:47 |
|
This is the same family in 1911 census |
|||
|
Stevendeg | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:53 |
|
Sue and Christine, I am trying to find Mary Allen in 1901 and 1911. Nothing to find her so I thought she might be married to someone after 1891. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Stevendeg | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:56 |
|
Sue, sorry it is not her. Because she was a single from 1871 to 1891 and worked for Edward Gale in Post Office at Caversham. Thanks for your time. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Clitheroelass | Report | 28 Jun 2009 08:56 |
|
These are all the Marys born in 1850 + - 3 years Caversham |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 28 Jun 2009 13:24 |
|
Hi Steven |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Stevendeg | Report | 30 Jun 2009 03:17 |
|
Hi Sue, many thanks for your great help and time. I appreciated it. I will follow it. |
|||
Researching: |
|||