| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
1 Dec 2008 04:32 |
|
Glad you weren't offended! It was late at night and it really was the first thing that came to mind just from the way you put it, lol.
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
30 Nov 2008 14:15 |
|
Christine,
Thanks for the last info. Have stayed away from 'puter for last couple of days to try and clear my head - if possible!.
There were no Durkins as witnesses on the marriage cert, and yes I did presume the mother was Bridget from earlier census.
Pat
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
30 Nov 2008 13:28 |
|
EvieBeavie,
Great comment! good sense of humour, and boy do I need some humour!!
Thanks
Pat
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
29 Nov 2008 01:40 |
|
groan!!
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 23:23 |
|
Why has no one said the obvious?
Pat is in a pickle looking for her Durkins.
Surely ..........
they were visting their cousins the Gherkins that night!
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 23:17 |
|
This one could be yours in 1881 as his age seems to differ in 1891/1901.
Had you only presumed his mother was Bridget from the census or do you have any other evidence.
1881 England Census about James Durkin Name: James Durkin Age: 24 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1857 Relation: Lodger Gender: Male Where born: Mayo CO, Ireland Civil Parish: Bradford County/Island: Yorkshire Country: England Street address: 91 Crown St Education:
Employment status: View Image <<<Occupation: Stone Masons Laborer Registration district: Bradford Sub registration district: Bradford, West End ED, institution, or vessel: 12 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Ann Durkin 20 James Durkin 24 John Durkin 26 John Durkin 18 Mary Durkin 24 Michael Durkin 13 Thomas Durkin 15 Ann Jennings 2 Harriet Jennings 4 John Jennings 31 Mary Jennings 26
Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 4452; Folio: 86; Page: 27
Were there any Durkins as witnesses on the marriage cert?
Christine
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:41 |
|
Sylvia,
I see where you're coming from now, I thought the 1881 census was the correct one because James tied in with age, occupation and mother called Bridget, but when Christine pointed out that the 1871 family were the same but with Martin as Head then it couldn't be right because James Durkin 2's father was also called James. I really am so confused I don't have any idea at this moment in time which one is likely to be my family, so I thank you for all your help and I'll start again right back to 1901. i just wish they didn't all have the same christian name.
Thank you again
Pat
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:33 |
|
Bridget mother in 1881 is listed as Widower
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:29 |
|
You say that this is your family?
1881 Census
1881 Census - 8 Leicester St, Bowling, Bradford Ann Durkin 24 - Swineford County Mayo Bridget Durkin 52 (Head) - Swineford County Mayo Bridget Durkin 12 - Bradford yorks b.ca 1869 Ellen Durkin 20 - Swineford County Mayo James Durkin 25 - Swineford County Mayo Luke Durkin 17 - Bradford Yorks b.ca 1864 Martin Durkin 15 - Bradford Yorks b.ca 1866 Thomas Durkin 9 - Bradford Yorks b.ca 1872 James Higgins 47 - Lodger
and this is the same family in 1871, which you have just said is not your family??
1871 Census
Name: Bridget Durkin Age: 43 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1828 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: Martin Gender: Female Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: Bowling Ecclesiastical parish: St Luke County/Island: Yorkshire
Registration district: Bradford Sub registration district: Bowling
Michael Devaney 40 Ann Durkin 12 b.ca 1859, Ireland Bridget Durkin 43 Bridget Durkin 2 b.ca 1869, Bradford Ellen Durkin 10 b.ca 1861, Ireland James Durkin 14 John Durkin 16 Luke Durkin 7 b.ca 1864, Bradford Martin Durkin 49 Martin Durkin 4 b.ca 1867, Bradford
The children on this one all match the children on the 1881
so I would suggest that you are also wrong with the 1881 census also!
sylvia
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:18 |
|
Christine,
Perhaps "Martin - Head" from 1871 census was just away from the address in 1881. What do you think
Pat
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:07 |
|
David,
Yes that's a good theory! Problem with that is Mary was born in Ireland. How do I go about getting copy of birth cert from there I've no idea about month and only an idea what year she was born?
Pat
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 20:56 |
|
Sylvia,
Here goes:-
JD 1 not actually listed as being in property on 1901 or 1891 but his birth certificate states he was born at 73 Chassum St. Manningham, Bradford. Can't find him anywhere - except there's a JD nephew aged 2 listed at 26 Longcroft Place, on 1891 census, have printed that off and left myself a note querying possibility its him. He's not listed on 1901 either, but as I have birth certificate I presumed it was the correct family.
1901 Census - 73 Chassum Str. Manningham Bradf James Durkin (2) - GGF age 49 Head - Ireland Catherine Durkin - 11 - Bradford Mary Durkin - 38 - Ireland Mary A Durkin - 8 - Bradford Winifred Durkin - 2 - Bradford
1891 Census - address as above James Durkin 37 - Ireland Mary Durkin 27 - Ireland Catherine Durkin 11/12 mnths - Bradford John Mullarkey 30 - Lodger - Ireland Michael Kelly 29 - Lodger - Ireland
1881 Census - 8 Leicester St, Bowling, Bradford Ann Durkin 24 - Swineford County Mayo Bridget Durkin 52 (Head) - Swineford County Mayo Bridget Durkin 12 - Bradford yorks Ellen Durkin 20 - Swineford County Mayo James Durkin 25 - Swineford County Mayo Luke Durkin 17 - Bradford Yorks Martin Durkin 15 - Bradford Yorks Thomas Durkin 9 - Bradford Yorks James Higgins 47 - Lodger
Reading other thread I've obviously got 1871 census completely wrong.
Haven't got JD 3 on any census.
Sorry don't know how to copy the actual census from ancestry.
Pat
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 20:20 |
|
It seems to be the same family as in 1881.
Christine
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 20:19 |
|
David,
Yes that's the one I thought was correct, but if her marriage certif says father is Patrick - then it could be wrong unless he had a second name of John maybe!
Pat
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 20:16 |
|
Christine,
Yes this was the one I was following, but have just realised that "Martin" is father's name and should read James.
I've obviously got the wrong one. In the 1881 - 8 Leicester St, Bridget is down as a widow, from the transcript and there are children called Luke, Ellen James, Bridget, Martin etc so I must have not read the 1871 properly. Sorry
Pat
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 20:09 |
|
I've been having real problems trying to find James Durkin 1, 2 and 3 on the various censuses as Pat says she has found them
Pat ...... could you give some more information on what the actual censuses say ...... especially yhe spellings of the names and birthplaces
sylvia
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 20:05 |
|
Is this the family you think are yours in 1871?
If so Bridget is not a widow, all the children until Luke 8 were born in Ireland so would not be on the 1861 census.
1871 England Census about James Durkin Name: James Durkin Age: 14 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1857 Relation: Son Father's Name: Martin Mother's Name: Bridget Gender: Male Where born: Ireland Civil Parish: Bowling Ecclesiastical parish: St Luke County/Island: Yorkshire Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Bradford Sub registration district: Bowling ED, institution, or vessel: 1 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 48 Household Members: Name Age Michael Devaney 40 Ann Durkin 12 Bridget Durkin 43 Bridget Durkin 2 Ellen Durkin 10 James Durkin 14 John Durkin 16 Luke Durkin 7 Martin Durkin 49 Martin Durkin 4
Christine
|
|
PatB243
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 19:41 |
|
In a bit of a pickle - can someone save me from a possible nervous breakdown trying to locate my GGG/F.
Info to date:
G/F - James Durkin - dob 1888 - Labourer - married Margaret McGlen 1911 GG G/F - James Durkin - 1854c - Masons Labourer - married Mary Mullarkey 1886 GGG G/F - James Durkin - ?? - ?? - married a Bridget I think going on census info on GG G/F.
Census 1891 & 1901 GG G/F lived 73 Chassum St. Bradford (son's b. cert. confirms) 1881 - single lived Leicester St. Bradford - Mother widow 1871 - single lived Bowling District Bradford - Mother widow 1861 - can't find At all addresses he's mason labourer/labourer
Just received GGG/F marriage cert and his father is listed as a "Farmer". I am having a job locating him could anyone help?
Also GGG/F's wife Mary Mullarkey's father is listed as Patrick - Schoolmaster (deceased) on certificate. Witness on cert is brother John Mullarkey. She was a Worsted Spinner.
I cannot find her listed on any census 1881, 1871 or 1861 with a father called Patrick. Can anyone point me in the right direction please?
In 1891 I thought I found her living at Greenaire Pl. Bradford and father was John.
Pat
|