Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Emma Appleton
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:08 |
|
This is the marriage reference of my g g grandmother |
|||
|
Marilyn | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:15 |
|
Not sure what your query is, but the birth index I tried between 1848 - 1851 for Emma Appleton - Hampshire and there is Emma Appleton Oct/Dec. .1852 Basingstoke reg.dist Vol.2c page 137. |
|||
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:17 |
|
Thank you Marilyn - I'm hoping to pin emma down on one of the census records prior to her marriage. |
|||
|
Marilyn | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:22 |
|
I think she is in the Basingstoke Workhouse on the 1861 census |
|||
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:23 |
|
Thank you Marilyn, I'll check it out. |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:25 |
|
These are the Appletons in Basing workhouse, but mother is down as single. |
|||
|
Marilyn | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:26 |
|
It states born Herriard, Hants, which is way out in the 'sticks' just off the A339 out of Basingstoke towards Alton. |
|||
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:28 |
|
Thank you for that Sue, I had a look on Ancestry and I saw she was single too! |
|||
|
Marilyn | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:31 |
|
I think the Sherborne St John she has on later census could be way off the mark, but I am sure her mother knew where she was born, as on 1861 census!!. |
|||
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:37 |
|
The problem I have Marilyn is that I dont know that it actually is her on the 1861 census. I would feel more comfortable accepting it if her father John had been listed! Very frustrating! |
|||
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:44 |
|
Shirley in the North East |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:45 |
|
1861....but no Emma. |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:46 |
|
See you already found it. |
|||
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:48 |
|
Thanks Sue C - I have just posted that one! I really think you may be onto something with that one. My grandmother was called Emily and it was always said she was named after her grandmother but when I found her as Emma on all census records I thought maybe they got it wrong! Maybe Emma was actually Emily and it was shortened. My grandmother was always Emmy. Its a real possibility!! |
|||
|
Marilyn | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:51 |
|
HI, I know how difficult it must be, but just to tell you that my husband's g.g.grandfather was one of 7 children all born to a single mother, none of them had father's listed on cert. but they must have all been given the line that their father's name was Thomas, even on some of their marriage cert. they put Thomas as their father, but their mother was living with her parents, referred to as single, when she died one of the daughter's was informant at death cert. and she listed Thomas as husband of the mother, so it does happen but it does not make it any better for you I know. |
|||
|
Marilyn | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:52 |
|
Yes I quite agree with what yoou have been sent, I can understand you taking a further look at that. Well done whoever it was who sent it. |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 2 Jul 2008 19:53 |
|
So...this must be her birth, if she is the right person. |
|||
|
Lindylu | Report | 2 Jul 2008 20:09 |
|
Ah Marilyn - I know how you feel too! My ancestors only lived to give me a hard time!! |
|||